Literature DB >> 33007769

Predictive dose accumulation for HN adaptive radiotherapy.

Donghoon Lee1, Pengpeng Zhang1, Saad Nadeem1, Sadegh Alam1, Jue Jiang1, Amanda Caringi1, Natasha Allgood1, Michalis Aristophanous1, James Mechalakos1, Yu-Chi Hu1.   

Abstract

During radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck (HN) cancer, the shape and volume of the parotid glands (PG) may change significantly, resulting in clinically relevant deviations of delivered dose from the planning dose. Early and accurate longitudinal prediction of PG anatomical changes during the RT can be valuable to inform decisions on plan adaptation. We developed a deep neural network for longitudinal predictions using the displacement fields (DFs) between the planning computed tomography (pCT) and weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sixty-three HN patients treated with volumetric modulated arc were retrospectively studied. We calculated DFs between pCT and week 1-3 CBCT by B-spline and Demon deformable image registration (DIR). The resultant DFs were subsequently used as input to our novel network to predict the week 4 to 6 DFs for generating predicted weekly PG contours and weekly dose distributions. For evaluation, we measured dice similarity (DICE), and the uncertainty of accumulated dose. Moreover, we compared the detection accuracies of candidates for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) when the trigger criteria were mean dose difference more than 10%, 7.5%, and 5%, respectively. The DICE of ipsilateral/contralateral PG at week 4 to 6 using the prediction model trained with B-spline were 0.81 [Formula: see text] 0.07/0.81 [Formula: see text] 0.04 (week 4), 0.79 [Formula: see text] 0.06/0.81 [Formula: see text] 0.05 (week 5) and 0.78 [Formula: see text] 0.06/0.82 [Formula: see text] (week 6). The DICE with the Demons model were 0.78 [Formula: see text] 0.08/0.82 [Formula: see text] 0.03 (week 4), 0.77 [Formula: see text] 0.07/0.82 [Formula: see text] 0.04 (week 5) and 0.75 [Formula: see text] 0.07/0.82 [Formula: see text] 0.02 (week 6). The dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis with the predicted accumulated dose showed the feasibility of predicting dose uncertainty due to the PG anatomical changes. The AUC of ART candidate detection with our predictive model was over 0.90. In conclusion, the proposed network was able to predict future anatomical changes and dose uncertainty of PGs with clinically acceptable accuracy, and hence can be readily integrated into the ART workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33007769      PMCID: PMC8404689          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abbdb8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

Review 1.  Deformable Registration for Dose Accumulation.

Authors:  Indrin J Chetty; Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Feasibility of multimodal deformable registration for head and neck tumor treatment planning.

Authors:  Valerio Fortunati; René F Verhaart; Francesco Angeloni; Aad van der Lugt; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland; Margarethus M Paulides; Theo van Walsum
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The effect of setup uncertainty on normal tissue sparing with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  M A Manning; Q Wu; R M Cardinale; R Mohan; A D Lauve; B D Kavanagh; M M Morris; R K Schmidt-Ullrich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region.

Authors:  J S Cooper; K Fu; J Marks; S Silverman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Adaptive radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial clinical outcomes from a prospective trial.

Authors:  David L Schwartz; Adam S Garden; Jimmy Thomas; Yipei Chen; Yongbin Zhang; Jan Lewin; Mark S Chambers; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Toward predicting the evolution of lung tumors during radiotherapy observed on a longitudinal MR imaging study via a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Chuang Wang; Andreas Rimner; Yu-Chi Hu; Neelam Tyagi; Jue Jiang; Ellen Yorke; Sadegh Riyahi; Gig Mageras; Joseph O Deasy; Pengpeng Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  SU-E-J-201: What is the Importance of Dose Recalculation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Dose Assessment?

Authors:  J Pukala; R Staton; K Langen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations.

Authors:  Catarina Veiga; Jamie McClelland; Syed Moinuddin; Ana Lourenço; Kate Ricketts; James Annkah; Marc Modat; Sébastien Ourselin; Derek D'Souza; Gary Royle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar; Kuo Ann Lee; Richard Yeo; Kheng-Wei Yeoh
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Predicting spatial esophageal changes in a multimodal longitudinal imaging study via a convolutional recurrent neural network.

Authors:  Chuang Wang; Sadegh R Alam; Siyuan Zhang; Yu-Chi Hu; Saad Nadeem; Neelam Tyagi; Andreas Rimner; Wei Lu; Maria Thor; Pengpeng Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of a Decision-Support Software for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sebastien A A Gros; Anand P Santhanam; Alec M Block; Bahman Emami; Brian H Lee; Cara Joyce
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.