Literature DB >> 12128109

High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Zvi Fuks, Margie Hunt, Yoshiya Yamada, Christine Marion, C Clifton Ling, Howard Amols, E S Venkatraman, Steven A Leibel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the acute and late toxicity and preliminary biochemical outcomes in 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1996 and January 2001, 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment was planned using an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. A total of 698 patients (90%) were treated to 81.0 Gy, and 74 patients (10%) were treated to 86.4 Gy. Acute and late toxicities were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scales. PSA relapse was defined according to The American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6-60 months).
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (4.5%) developed acute Grade 2 rectal toxicity, and no patient experienced acute Grade 3 or higher rectal symptoms. Two hundred seventeen patients (28%) developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms, and one experienced urinary retention (Grade 3). Eleven patients (1.5%) developed late Grade 2 rectal bleeding. Four patients (0.1%) experienced Grade 3 rectal toxicity requiring either one or more transfusions or a laser cauterization procedure. No Grade 4 rectal complications have been observed. The 3-year actuarial likelihood of >/= late Grade 2 rectal toxicity was 4%. Seventy-two patients (9%) experienced late Grade 2 urinary toxicity, and five (0.5%) developed Grade 3 urinary toxicity (urethral stricture). The 3-year actuarial likelihood of >/= late Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 15%. The 3-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk group patients were 92%, 86%, and 81%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the feasibility of high-dose IMRT in a large number of patients. Acute and late rectal toxicities seem to be significantly reduced compared with what has been observed with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques. Short-term PSA control rates seem to be at least comparable to those achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at similar dose levels. Based on this favorable risk:benefit ratio, IMRT has become the standard mode of conformal treatment delivery for localized prostate cancer at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12128109     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02857-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  127 in total

Review 1.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  External beam radiation therapy: role of androgen deprivation.

Authors:  Patrick Kupelian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Technological advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehee Choi; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation therapy: evidence versus opinion.

Authors:  Ferran Guedea; Alfredo Ramos; Ismael Herruzo; José Antonio Sánchez Calzado; Jorge Contreras; Jesús Romero; Jordi Craven-Bartle; Patricia Willisch; José Luis López Torrecilla; Xavier Maldonado; Gemma Sancho; Almudena Zapatero; Montserrat Ferrer; Yolanda Pardo; Pablo Fernández; Alfonso Mariño; Asunción Hervás; Víctor Macís; Ana Boladeras; Ferran Ferrer; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Prostate cancer: Patient-reported functional outcomes with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Recommendations for treatment with IMRT for prostate and head-neck cancer. Axencia de Avaliación de Tecnoloxías Sanitarias de Galicia.

Authors:  M del Carmen Maceira Rozas; Teresa Rey Liste; Angela L García Caeiro; Julio García Comesaña
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Risk of second cancer from scattered radiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapies with lung cancer.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Weon Kuu Chung; Dongoh Shin; Seongeon Hong; Sung Ho Park; Sung-Yong Park; Kwangzoo Chung; Young Kyung Lim; Dongho Shin; Se Byeong Lee; Hyun-Ho Lee; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Ishii; Ryo Ogino; Yukinari Hosokawa; Chiaki Fujioka; Wataru Okada; Ryota Nakahara; Ryu Kawamorita; Takuhito Tada; Yoshiki Hayashi; Toshifumi Nakajima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.