Literature DB >> 20346142

Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Hiromasa Takahashi1, Shigeaki Moriyama, Haruhiko Furuta, Hisao Matsunaga, Yuki Sakamoto, Toshihiro Kikuta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA).
METHODS: The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads.
RESULTS: The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations.
CONCLUSIONS: The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20346142      PMCID: PMC2853503          DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Face Med        ISSN: 1746-160X            Impact factor:   2.151


  35 in total

1.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  R T Hart; V V Hennebel; N Thongpreda; W C Van Buskirk; R C Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Bariş Simşek; Erkan Erkmen; Derviş Yilmaz; Atilim Eser
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.

Authors:  B Ozden; A Alkan; S Arici; E Erdem
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Evaluation of different miniplates in fixation of fractured human mandible with the finite element method.

Authors:  Hasan Husnu Korkmaz
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-04-30

5.  Orthognathic surgery and a tale of how three procedures came to be: a letter to the next generations of surgeons.

Authors:  Hugo L Obwegeser
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.

Authors:  Hyun-Joong Yoon; Joe Rebellato; Eugene E Keller
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.

Authors:  Il-Hyuk Chung; Chung-Kyu Yoo; Eun-Kyung Lee; Jong-An Ihm; Chang-Joo Park; Ji-Sun Lim; Kyung-Gyun Hwang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia measured by trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential between different types of mandibular osteotomies and fixation.

Authors:  Yukari Hashiba; Koichiro Ueki; Kohei Marukawa; Mayumi Shimada; Kan Yoshida; Chika Shimizu; Shamiul Alam; Kiyomasa Nakagawa
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-04-20

Review 9.  A new technique for mandibular osteotomy.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Applied mechanics of the Puricelli osteotomy: a linear elastic analysis with the finite element method.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli; Jun Sérgio Ono Fonseca; Marcel Fasolo de Paris; Hervandil Sant'Anna
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  5 in total

1.  Finite Element Analysis: A Maxillofacial Surgeon's Perspective.

Authors:  S Shyam Sundar; B Nandlal; D Saikrishna; G Mallesh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

2.  Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  Laura A Monson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Vertical fracture of the mandibular posterior ramus border secondary to the stress of the rigid internal fixation material.

Authors:  Metin Sencimen; Aydin Gulses; Hasan Ayberk Altug
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-06

4.  Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Ahmet Ercan Sekerci; Halil Sahman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Impacted third molars in sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism and micrognathia.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.