Literature DB >> 18280376

Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.

Il-Hyuk Chung1, Chung-Kyu Yoo, Eun-Kyung Lee, Jong-An Ihm, Chang-Joo Park, Ji-Sun Lim, Kyung-Gyun Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This comparative study was performed to analyze mandibular stability after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with a monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients with a skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular setback were included in the present study. Among the patients, 30 were osteosynthesized monocortically with a titanium plate, while the other 30 were osteosynthesized bicortically with positioning screws. This retrospective study used cephalometric radiographs taken preoperatively (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 3 months (T2), and 1 year (T3) postoperatively. The linear and angular changes of the cephalometric landmarks of the chin region were measured at each time period, and the changes of each cephalometric landmark were determined for 4 different time intervals: T0 to T1 (Delta T1), T1 to T2 (Delta T2), T2 to T3 (Delta T3), and T0 to T3 (Delta T4). Postoperative changes in mandibular shape were analyzed using a paired t test to determine the stability of fixation methods.
RESULTS: The surgical changes (Delta T1) could be characterized as posterior movements of the mandibular body and posterosuperior movements of the chin landmark. The results of the cephalometric analysis at 3 and 12 months postsurgery (Delta T2 and Delta T3) could be characterized as anterosuperior movements of the mandible. In both treatment groups, surgical changes were relatively well maintained. Likewise, analysis of the horizontal and vertical movements of the chin landmarks indicated a similar tendency in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the measurements of postoperative changes at each time period after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest that there were no significant differences in postoperative changes in mandibular shape in both the monocortical and bicortical fixation groups after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. We concluded that monocortical osteosynthesis using a miniplate could be used to obtain stable postoperative changes after mandibular setback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280376     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison between positioning screws and plate.

Authors:  Nasser Nooh
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

2.  Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takahashi; Shigeaki Moriyama; Haruhiko Furuta; Hisao Matsunaga; Yuki Sakamoto; Toshihiro Kikuta
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Vertical fracture of the mandibular posterior ramus border secondary to the stress of the rigid internal fixation material.

Authors:  Metin Sencimen; Aydin Gulses; Hasan Ayberk Altug
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-06

4.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Huy Xuan Ngo; Yunpeng Bai; Jingjing Sha; Shinji Ishizuka; Erina Toda; Rie Osako; Akira Kato; Reon Morioka; Mrunalini Ramanathan; Hiroto Tatsumi; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Sun-Kyu Choi; Jung-Gon Lee; Han-Chang Yu; Sang-Yun Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Yonsoo Shin; Nam-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Biocompatibility evaluation of peo-treated magnesium alloy implants placed in rabbit femur condyle notches and paravertebral muscles.

Authors:  Seong Ryoung Kim; Keon Mo Lee; Jin Hong Kim; Young Jin Choi; Han Ick Park; Hwa Chul Jung; Hyung Jin Roh; Jee Hye Lo Han; Joon Rae Kim; Bu-Kyu Lee
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2022-07-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.