Literature DB >> 16687240

In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.

B Ozden1, A Alkan, S Arici, E Erdem.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the biomechanical stability of 10 different fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy. Twenty-five fresh sheep mandibles were stripped of all soft tissues and sectioned at the midline. A sagittal split osteotomy with 5mm advancement was performed on each hemimandible. The hemimandibles were randomly divided into 10 groups of 5, and then fixed with 5 different bicortical screws, 4 different miniplates with or without bicortical screws, and 1 resorbable screw configuration. All specimens were mounted on a specially designed 3-point biomechanical test model and compression loads were applied using the Lloyd LRX testing machine until 3mm displacement was reached. Load/displacement data were gathered and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction (P<0.01). The 3 bicortical screws in an inverted backward-L pattern provided the most biomechanical stability of the screw patterns tested. The miniplate fixed obliquely with 2 bicortical screws in the proximal segment provided the most biomechanical stability of the miniplate groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16687240     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takahashi; Shigeaki Moriyama; Haruhiko Furuta; Hisao Matsunaga; Yuki Sakamoto; Toshihiro Kikuta
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gleysson Matias de Assis; Victor Diniz Borborema Dos Santos; Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço Queiroz; Adriano Rocha Germano
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-10

3.  Comparison of the Stability of Mandibular Sagittal Osteotomy Fixation between Two Types of Titanium Miniplates: A Biomechanical Study in Sheep Mandibles.

Authors:  Guilherme Dos Santos Trento; Felipe Andrade Pires; Fábio André Dos Santos; Delson João da Costa; Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebellato; Leandro Eduardo Klüppel
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-18

4.  Biomechanical Loading Evaluation of Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide Plate System in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Takahiro Kanno; Yoshiki Manabe; Kenichi Matsumoto; Yuka Sukegawa-Takahashi; Masanori Masui; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 7.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Leandro Benetti de Olivera; Eduardo Sant' Ana; Antonio José Manzato; Fábio Luis Bunemer Guerra; G William Arnett
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.