Literature DB >> 15979921

Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.

Bariş Simşek1, Erkan Erkmen, Derviş Yilmaz, Atilim Eser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different inter-implant distances on stress distribution in the bone around the endosseous titanium implants under vertical, oblique and horizontal loads in the posterior mandibular edentulousim by finite element analysis (3D FEA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D FEA models representing mandible and ITI implant (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were simulated. The distances in-between the units were set at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm. Vertical (V) 70 degrees N, 60 degrees oblique (BL) 35 degrees N in buccolingual direction and horizontal (MD) 14 degrees N in mesiodistal direction loads were applied to each of these designs. The principal stresses (tensile and compressive stress) on each model were calculated using MSC MARC finite element analyze solver software.
RESULTS: The tensile stress (P(max)) values have been evaluated that they rose at the cervical region of buccal side when the inter-implant distances increased under V and BL loads and they diminished while the inter-implant distances decreased. In short inter-implant distances the compressive stress (P(min)) has been presented with increased values and found at the lingual surface of the cervical region. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicated that the magnitude of the stress was influenced by complex factors such as the direction of loads and the distance between adjacent fixtures. The stress occurring around fixtures differs significantly with various types of inter-implant distance.
CONCLUSION: The evaluation of tensile and compressive stresses for cortical and cancellous bone under V, MD and BL loading conditions in aspect of inter-implant distance shows; the 1.0 cm of inter-implant distance is the optimum distance for two fixture implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979921     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takahashi; Shigeaki Moriyama; Haruhiko Furuta; Hisao Matsunaga; Yuki Sakamoto; Toshihiro Kikuta
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Comparison of Stability of Fracture Segments in Mandible Fracture Treated with Different Designs of Mini-Plates Using FEM Analysis.

Authors:  Udupikrishna Joshi; Manju Kurakar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

5.  Effect of the number of implants on stress distribution of anterior implant-supported fixed prostheses combined with a removable partial denture: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Minoo Mahshid; Allahyar Geramy; Massoud Ejlali; Majid Sedaghat Monfared; Shirin Rezvani Habib Abadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-05-31

6.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioactive Material in Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Vathsala Patil; Nithesh Naik; Srikanth Gadicherla; Komal Smriti; Adithya Raju; Udit Rathee
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Analysis of Stress Distribution on the Bone around an Implant Placed in the Anterior Maxilla Using Three Different Abutment Angulations by Means of Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Snehal Shende; Amit Jadhav; Dhairaysheel N Edake; Amit Hemraj Patil; Hansraj Patil; Nitu Agrawal
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  FEA model analysis of the effects of the stress distribution of saddle-type implants on the alveolar bone and the structural/physical stability of implants.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Kong; Jun Woo Park; Dong Ju Choi
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-02-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.