| Literature DB >> 20346114 |
Simone Scalabrin1, Michela Troggio, Marco Moroldo, Massimo Pindo, Nicoletta Felice, Giuseppina Coppola, Giacomo Prete, Giulia Malacarne, Raffaella Marconi, Giorgia Faes, Irena Jurman, Stella Grando, Taco Jesse, Cinzia Segala, Giorgio Valle, Alberto Policriti, Paolo Fontana, Michele Morgante, Riccardo Velasco.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars grown today are those selected centuries ago, even though grapevine is one of the most important fruit crops in the world. Grapevine has therefore not benefited from the advances in modern plant breeding nor more recently from those in molecular genetics and genomics: genes controlling important agronomic traits are practically unknown. A physical map is essential to positionally clone such genes and instrumental in a genome sequencing project.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20346114 PMCID: PMC2865496 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Effect of heterozygosity on the assembly of the physical map. a| and b| CB Maps of two real contigs of the grape physical map ('a' corresponds to contig number 69 and 'b' to contig number 354) showing the so called 'scissoring effect', one of the main consequences of heterozygosity. On both contigs a polymorphic SNP marker has been physically mapped by BAC-pooling first, followed by PCR determination of the BAC clones containing each of the two alleles. The clones on which one allele maps have been highlighted in red and the ones on which the other allele maps in blue. It is interesting to observe that the two alleles of the same SNP marker map onto different clones which are not overlapping each other. The problem which affects the assembly of these two contigs has been called 'scissoring effect'. Basically, the clones within a contig tend to split apart, with the ones belonging to one allele at one extremity and the ones belonging to the other allele at the other extremity. As a consequence, the affected contigs show an expansion in the CB map size. c| and d| Two plots depicting simulated contigs from the in silico simulation at 42% sequence divergence, where the clones belonging to one allele have been highlighted in orange and the ones belonging to the other allele in blue. In 'c' the 'scissoring effect' is particularly evident on the right extremity, while the other part of the contig shows a more complex situation. Indeed, the scissoring effect can be locally more or less important and this is thought to be related to the variation in the levels of heterozygosity along the contig/chromosome. This situation is particularly consistent with the pictures 'a' and 'b'. The contig displayed in 'd' shows instead a different situation, being made up by clones which belong only to one allele (in orange). This scenario is consistent with the cases of allele testing in which the two alleles hybridize onto separate contigs (see text).
Sources of BACs fingerprinted to develop the Pinot Noir physical map
| Libraries | Cloning site | Mean insert size | No. of clones fingerprinted | Genome coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| grp01 (Evry) | 93 kb | 23,040 | 4.6 × | |
| grp02 (Keygene) | 125 kb | 26,064 | 6.8 × | |
| Total (Both libraries) | 110 kb | 49,104 | 11.4× | |
Status of the grape cv. Pinot Noir physical map assembly.
| Number of clones fingerprinted | 49,104 |
|---|---|
| Number of clones used for map assembly | 38,983 |
| Number of singletons | 3,372 |
| Number of contigs | 1,804 |
| >200 clones | 1 |
| 101-200 clones | 14 |
| 51-100 clones | 139 |
| 26-50 clones | 350 |
| 10-25 clones | 503 |
| 3-9 clones | 557 |
| 2 clones | 240 |
| Unique bands in the contigs | 807,776 |
| Total physical length of the contigs (Mb)* | 888 |
| Number of Q clones | 2,310 |
| Number of Q contigs | 662 |
*Each fingerprinted band was estimated to represent an average of 1.1 kb. The estimate was based on the average insert size of the BAC clones divided by the average number of bands per clone used for contig assembling
Computer simulations of the effects of haplotype polymorphism on contig assembly using FPC.
| % different fingerprint bands | % average sequence divergence | Consensus band units for entire region | Map coverage of the region | Number of contigs | % Questionable clones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1,172.5 ± 39.9 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 25 | 2.5 | 1,252.4 ± 89.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 4.9 |
| 42* | 4.2 | 1,681.6 ± 129.4 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 18.8 ± 8.5 |
| 50 | 5.0 | 1,717.7 ± 206.5 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 24.7 ± 9.2 |
For each level of sequence divergence average and standard deviation values were computed for each of the parameters out of ten replicates. Coverage values are the ratio between the CB map length of the simulated contig and the CB map length of the original region (1,192 CB units).
* The average of 42% difference in fingerprint bands results from two areas without differences (containing 100 bands each, simulating small regions of identity by descent) and 50% difference in the rest of the region. In the other two cases differences were randomly distributed across the region.
Results of BAC pools screening with molecular markers.
| ESTs | SSRs | AFLPs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markers not assigned to BAC clones* | 36 | 25 | 13 |
| | 16 | 7 | 8 |
| | 20 | 18 | 5 |
| Markers assigned to BAC clones: | 138 | 108 | 149 |
| | 82 | 54 | 39 |
| | 36 | 38 | 69 |
| | 6 | 7 | 31 |
| | 14 | 9 | 10 |
| Tested | 174 | 133 | 162 |
Following BAC screening, each single putatively positive BAC clone has been picked and tested to confirm the primary pool screening result.
* average number of BAC clones identified for each marker type
Statistics of the grape cv. Pinot Noir physical map by linkage group
| Linkage group | No. of contigs | Coverage (Mb) | Average contig size (Kb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 16.442 | 747.4 |
| 2 | 23 | 18.086 | 786.3 |
| 3 | 18 | 16.723 | 929.1 |
| 4 | 20 | 16.204 | 810.2 |
| 5 | 21 | 19.363 | 922.0 |
| 6 | 24 | 19.514 | 813.1 |
| 7 | 29 | 23.517 | 810.9 |
| 8 | 27 | 19.104 | 707.6 |
| 9 | 16 | 9.922 | 620.1 |
| 10 | 26 | 17.971 | 691.2 |
| 11 | 20 | 16.114 | 805.7 |
| 12 | 21 | 18.910 | 900.5 |
| 13 | 28 | 22.111 | 789.7 |
| 14 | 24 | 21.627 | 901.1 |
| 15 | 17 | 12.814 | 753.8 |
| 16 | 20 | 10.416 | 520.8 |
| 17 | 18 | 17.927 | 995.9 |
| 18 | 37 | 28.286 | 764.5 |
| 19 | 25 | 16.570 | 662.8 |
| Unassigned | 2 | 1.600 | 800.0 |
| Total contigs assigned to markers | 436 | 341.621 | 783.5 |
| Unassigned contigs | 1,368 | 534.832 | 391.0 |
| Total contigs | 1,804 | 888.553 | 492.5 |
Figure 2Comparison of the physical contig 50 (CB units 0-1,000) with linkage group 17 (10-20 cM interval in the genetic map) and the cluster 9651 (2-3 Mb) from the genome sequence assembly of Pinot noir (CMap viewer available at . Correspondences among marker loci in the genetic map, BAC clones in the physical contig, and marker positions in the sequence are displayed with solid lines.
Chimeric clones detected by BES alignment versus the genomic sequence (linkage groups between parentheses) and by counting putative intra-plate contaminations (high number of clones from a single plate, in parentheses, in the same contig)
| Contig | Putative chimeric clone(s) | Detection method | E-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 1047_O11, 1040_J15 | BES alignment (7, 14) | |
| 31 | 1101_K03, 2051_H20 | BES alignment (2, 7) | |
| 61 | 1037_H06 | BES alignment (4, 5) | |
| 329 | 2024_E09, 1093_O01 | BES alignment (2, 18) | 3e-25 |
| 458 | 1087_L01 | BES alignment (1, 14) | |
| 552 | 2010_D07 | BES alignment (2,18) | |
| 961 | 1038_L10 | BES alignment (6, 16) | 4e-37 |
| 994 | 1086_L13 | BES alignment (4, 14) | 3e-26 |
| 1424 | 1084_I11, 1099_A14 | BES alignment (4, 16) | 2e-25 |
| 2207 | All clones from plate 1044 | Intra-plate (1044) | |
| 2811 | 1039_G08, 1041_B15 | BES alignment (18, 19), Intra-plate (1039) | |
| 3130 | Uncertain | BES alignment (7, 10, 14) | |