Literature DB >> 12181558

A physical map of the mouse genome.

Simon G Gregory1, Mandeep Sekhon, Jacqueline Schein, Shaying Zhao, Kazutoyo Osoegawa, Carol E Scott, Richard S Evans, Paul W Burridge, Tony V Cox, Christopher A Fox, Richard D Hutton, Ian R Mullenger, Kimbly J Phillips, James Smith, Jim Stalker, Glen J Threadgold, Ewan Birney, Kristine Wylie, Asif Chinwalla, John Wallis, LaDeana Hillier, Jason Carter, Tony Gaige, Sara Jaeger, Colin Kremitzki, Dan Layman, Jason Maas, Rebecca McGrane, Kelly Mead, Rebecca Walker, Steven Jones, Michael Smith, Jennifer Asano, Ian Bosdet, Susanna Chan, Suganthi Chittaranjan, Readman Chiu, Chris Fjell, Dan Fuhrmann, Noreen Girn, Catharine Gray, Ran Guin, Letticia Hsiao, Martin Krzywinski, Reta Kutsche, Soo Sen Lee, Carrie Mathewson, Candice McLeavy, Steve Messervier, Steven Ness, Pawan Pandoh, Anna-Liisa Prabhu, Parvaneh Saeedi, Duane Smailus, Lorraine Spence, Jeff Stott, Sheryl Taylor, Wesley Terpstra, Miranda Tsai, Jill Vardy, Natasja Wye, George Yang, Sofiya Shatsman, Bola Ayodeji, Keita Geer, Getahun Tsegaye, Alla Shvartsbeyn, Elizabeth Gebregeorgis, Margaret Krol, Daniel Russell, Larry Overton, Joel A Malek, Mike Holmes, Michael Heaney, Jyoti Shetty, Tamara Feldblyum, William C Nierman, Joseph J Catanese, Tim Hubbard, Robert H Waterston, Jane Rogers, Pieter J de Jong, Claire M Fraser, Marco Marra, John D McPherson, David R Bentley.   

Abstract

A physical map of a genome is an essential guide for navigation, allowing the location of any gene or other landmark in the chromosomal DNA. We have constructed a physical map of the mouse genome that contains 296 contigs of overlapping bacterial clones and 16,992 unique markers. The mouse contigs were aligned to the human genome sequence on the basis of 51,486 homology matches, thus enabling use of the conserved synteny (correspondence between chromosome blocks) of the two genomes to accelerate construction of the mouse map. The map provides a framework for assembly of whole-genome shotgun sequence data, and a tile path of clones for generation of the reference sequence. Definition of the human-mouse alignment at this level of resolution enables identification of a mouse clone that corresponds to almost any position in the human genome. The human sequence may be used to facilitate construction of other mammalian genome maps using the same strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181558     DOI: 10.1038/nature00957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  104 in total

1.  The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications.

Authors:  Dan Larhammar; Lars-Gustav Lundin; Finn Hallböök
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative sequence analysis of a single-gene conserved segment in mouse and human.

Authors:  James W Thomas; Eric D Green
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Antigenic drift as a mechanism for tumor evasion of destruction by cytolytic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Bai; Jinqing Liu; Ou Li; Pan Zheng; Yang Liu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Software for automated analysis of DNA fingerprinting gels.

Authors:  Daniel R Fuhrmann; Martin I Krzywinski; Readman Chiu; Parvaneh Saeedi; Jacqueline E Schein; Ian E Bosdet; Asif Chinwalla; LaDeana W Hillier; Robert H Waterston; John D McPherson; Steven J M Jones; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  A BAC- and BIBAC-based physical map of the soybean genome.

Authors:  Chengcang Wu; Shuku Sun; Padmavathi Nimmakayala; Felipe A Santos; Khalid Meksem; Rachael Springman; Kejiao Ding; David A Lightfoot; Hong-Bin Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A whole-genome mouse BAC microarray with 1-Mb resolution for analysis of DNA copy number changes by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Yeun-Jun Chung; Jos Jonkers; Hannah Kitson; Heike Fiegler; Sean Humphray; Carol Scott; Sarah Hunt; Yuejin Yu; Ichiko Nishijima; Arno Velds; Henne Holstege; Nigel Carter; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Pericentromeric duplications in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  James W Thomas; Mary G Schueler; Tyrone J Summers; Robert W Blakesley; Jennifer C McDowell; Pamela J Thomas; Jacquelyn R Idol; Valerie V B Maduro; Shih-Queen Lee-Lin; Jeffrey W Touchman; Gerard G Bouffard; Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Cross-species sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Laura Elnitski; Deanna M Church; Inna Dubchak; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The comprehensive mouse radiation hybrid map densely cross-referenced to the recombination map: a tool to support the sequence assemblies.

Authors:  Lucy B Rowe; Mary E Barter; Jennifer A Kelmenson; Janan T Eppig
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Locating sequence on FPC maps and selecting a minimal tiling path.

Authors:  Friedrich W Engler; James Hatfield; William Nelson; Carol A Soderlund
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.