Literature DB >> 15592415

A physical map of the chicken genome.

John W Wallis1, Jan Aerts, Martien A M Groenen, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Dan Layman, Tina A Graves, Debra E Scheer, Colin Kremitzki, Mary J Fedele, Nancy K Mudd, Marco Cardenas, Jamey Higginbotham, Jason Carter, Rebecca McGrane, Tony Gaige, Kelly Mead, Jason Walker, Derek Albracht, Jonathan Davito, Shiaw-Pyng Yang, Shin Leong, Asif Chinwalla, Mandeep Sekhon, Kristine Wylie, Jerry Dodgson, Michael N Romanov, Hans Cheng, Pieter J de Jong, Kazutoyo Osoegawa, Mikhail Nefedov, Hongbin Zhang, John D McPherson, Martin Krzywinski, Jacquie Schein, Ladeana Hillier, Elaine R Mardis, Richard K Wilson, Wesley C Warren.   

Abstract

Strategies for assembling large, complex genomes have evolved to include a combination of whole-genome shotgun sequencing and hierarchal map-assisted sequencing. Whole-genome maps of all types can aid genome assemblies, generally starting with low-resolution cytogenetic maps and ending with the highest resolution of sequence. Fingerprint clone maps are based upon complete restriction enzyme digests of clones representative of the target genome, and ultimately comprise a near-contiguous path of clones across the genome. Such clone-based maps are used to validate sequence assembly order, supply long-range linking information for assembled sequences, anchor sequences to the genetic map and provide templates for closing gaps. Fingerprint maps are also a critical resource for subsequent functional genomic studies, because they provide a redundant and ordered sampling of the genome with clones. In an accompanying paper we describe the draft genome sequence of the chicken, Gallus gallus, the first species sequenced that is both a model organism and a global food source. Here we present a clone-based physical map of the chicken genome at 20-fold coverage, containing 260 contigs of overlapping clones. This map represents approximately 91% of the chicken genome and enables identification of chicken clones aligned to positions in other sequenced genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15592415     DOI: 10.1038/nature03030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  58 in total

1.  The transposable element profile of the anolis genome: How a lizard can provide insights into the evolution of vertebrate genome size and structure.

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Construction of BIBAC and BAC libraries from a variety of organisms for advanced genomics research.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Zhang; Chantel F Scheuring; Meiping Zhang; Yang Zhang; Cheng-Cang Wu; Jennifer J Dong; Yaning Li
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Optimization of volumetric computed tomography for skeletal analysis of model genetic organisms.

Authors:  Sergio X Vasquez; Mark S Hansen; Ali N Bahadur; Matthew F Hockin; Gordon L Kindlmann; Lisa Nevell; Isabel Q Wu; David J Grunwald; David M Weinstein; Greg M Jones; Christopher R Johnson; John L Vandeberg; Mario R Capecchi; Charles Keller
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Per Wahlberg; Mario Foglio; Hans H Cheng; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Francois Besnier; Mark Lathrop; William M Muir; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Ivo Gut; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Advanced technologies for genomic analysis in farm animals and its application for QTL mapping.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Hu; Yu Gao; Chungang Feng; Qiuyue Liu; Xiaobo Wang; Zhuo Du; Qingsong Wang; Ning Li
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions.

Authors:  Laurie Gordon; Shan Yang; Mary Tran-Gyamfi; Dan Baggott; Mari Christensen; Aaron Hamilton; Richard Crooijmans; Martien Groenen; Susan Lucas; Ivan Ovcharenko; Lisa Stubbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Physical mapping in highly heterozygous genomes: a physical contig map of the Pinot Noir grapevine cultivar.

Authors:  Simone Scalabrin; Michela Troggio; Marco Moroldo; Massimo Pindo; Nicoletta Felice; Giuseppina Coppola; Giacomo Prete; Giulia Malacarne; Raffaella Marconi; Giorgia Faes; Irena Jurman; Stella Grando; Taco Jesse; Cinzia Segala; Giorgio Valle; Alberto Policriti; Paolo Fontana; Michele Morgante; Riccardo Velasco
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Regional differences in recombination hotspots between two chicken populations.

Authors:  Martin G Elferink; Pieter van As; Tineke Veenendaal; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Genome-wide identification and analysis of the chicken basic helix-loop-helix factors.

Authors:  Wu-Yi Liu; Chun-Jiang Zhao
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-05-03

10.  The value of avian genomics to the conservation of wildlife.

Authors:  Michael N Romanov; Elaina M Tuttle; Marlys L Houck; William S Modi; Leona G Chemnick; Marisa L Korody; Emily M Stremel Mork; Christie A Otten; Tanya Renner; Kenneth C Jones; Sugandha Dandekar; Jeanette C Papp; Yang Da; Eric D Green; Vincent Magrini; Matthew T Hickenbotham; Jarret Glasscock; Sean McGrath; Elaine R Mardis; Oliver A Ryder
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.