OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of microphone placement on the interaural level differences (ILDs) available to bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users, and the subsequent effects on horizontal-plane sound localization. DESIGN: Virtual acoustic stimuli for sound localization testing were created individually for eight BiCI users by making acoustic transfer function measurements for microphones placed in the ear (ITE), behind the ear (BTE), and on the shoulders (SHD). The ILDs across source locations were calculated for each placement to analyze their effect on sound localization performance. Sound localization was tested using a repeated-measures, within-participant design for the three microphone placements. RESULTS: The ITE microphone placement provided significantly larger ILDs compared to BTE and SHD placements, which correlated with overall localization errors. However, differences in localization errors across the microphone conditions were small. CONCLUSIONS: The BTE microphones worn by many BiCI users in everyday life do not capture the full range of acoustic ILDs available, and also reduce the change in cue magnitudes for sound sources across the horizontal plane. Acute testing with an ITE placement reduced sound localization errors along the horizontal plane compared to the other placements in some patients. Larger improvements may be observed if patients had more experience with the new ILD cues provided by an ITE placement.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of microphone placement on the interaural level differences (ILDs) available to bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users, and the subsequent effects on horizontal-plane sound localization. DESIGN: Virtual acoustic stimuli for sound localization testing were created individually for eight BiCI users by making acoustic transfer function measurements for microphones placed in the ear (ITE), behind the ear (BTE), and on the shoulders (SHD). The ILDs across source locations were calculated for each placement to analyze their effect on sound localization performance. Sound localization was tested using a repeated-measures, within-participant design for the three microphone placements. RESULTS: The ITE microphone placement provided significantly larger ILDs compared to BTE and SHD placements, which correlated with overall localization errors. However, differences in localization errors across the microphone conditions were small. CONCLUSIONS: The BTE microphones worn by many BiCI users in everyday life do not capture the full range of acoustic ILDs available, and also reduce the change in cue magnitudes for sound sources across the horizontal plane. Acute testing with an ITE placement reduced sound localization errors along the horizontal plane compared to the other placements in some patients. Larger improvements may be observed if patients had more experience with the new ILD cues provided by an ITE placement.
Authors: Justin M Aronoff; Yang-Soo Yoon; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Michael F Dorman; Louise Loiselle; Josh Stohl; William A Yost; Anthony Spahr; Chris Brown; Sarah Cook Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Elizabeth R Kolberg; Sterling W Sheffield; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Sebastian A Ausili; Bradford Backus; Martijn J H Agterberg; A John van Opstal; Marc M van Wanrooij Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Tim Fischer; Christoph Schmid; Martin Kompis; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2021 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 3.562