Literature DB >> 20308099

On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection.

James F Crow1.   

Abstract

There is a difference in viewpoint of developmental and evo-devo geneticists versus breeders and students of quantitative evolution. The former are interested in understanding the developmental process; the emphasis is on identifying genes and studying their action and interaction. Typically, the genes have individually large effects and usually show substantial dominance and epistasis. The latter group are interested in quantitative phenotypes rather than individual genes. Quantitative traits are typically determined by many genes, usually with little dominance or epistasis. Furthermore, epistatic variance has minimum effect, since the selected population soon arrives at a state in which the rate of change is given by the additive variance or covariance. Thus, the breeder's custom of ignoring epistasis usually gives a more accurate prediction than if epistatic variance were included in the formulae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308099      PMCID: PMC2871814          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  19 in total

Review 1.  Understanding quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  N H Barton; P D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  An advantage of sexual reproduction in a rapidly changing environment.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Genetics. A century of corn selection.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Attainment of Quasi Linkage Equilibrium When Gene Frequencies Are Changing by Natural Selection.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical mechanics and the evolution of polygenic quantitative traits.

Authors:  N H Barton; H P de Vladar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  On the application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology.

Authors:  N H Barton; J B Coe
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Maintaining evolvability.

Authors:  James F Crow
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 8.  The language of gene interaction.

Authors:  P C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  The fuel of evolution.

Authors:  C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Additive, epistatic, and environmental effects through the lens of expression variability QTL in a twin cohort.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Ence Yang; Candice L Brinkmeyer-Langford; James J Cai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.

Authors:  Nanye Long; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Interactions among flower-size QTL of Mimulus guttatus are abundant but highly variable in nature.

Authors:  John K Kelly; Julius P Mojica
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  More than the sum of its parts: a complex epistatic network underlies natural variation in thermal preference behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Bryn E Gaertner; Michelle D Parmenter; Matthew V Rockman; Leonid Kruglyak; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Epistasis and immunity: the role of genetic interactions in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Anna M Rose; Lucy C K Bell
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.

Authors:  Asko Mäki-Tanila; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Extinction risk and eco-evolutionary dynamics in a variable environment with increasing frequency of extreme events.

Authors:  Simone Vincenzi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.