Literature DB >> 24990992

Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.

Asko Mäki-Tanila1, William G Hill2.   

Abstract

Although research effort is being expended into determining the importance of epistasis and epistatic variance for complex traits, there is considerable controversy about their importance. Here we undertake an analysis for quantitative traits utilizing a range of multilocus quantitative genetic models and gene frequency distributions, focusing on the potential magnitude of the epistatic variance. All the epistatic terms involving a particular locus appear in its average effect, with the number of two-locus interaction terms increasing in proportion to the square of the number of loci and that of third order as the cube and so on. Hence multilocus epistasis makes substantial contributions to the additive variance and does not, per se, lead to large increases in the nonadditive part of the genotypic variance. Even though this proportion can be high where epistasis is antagonistic to direct effects, it reduces with multiple loci. As the magnitude of the epistatic variance depends critically on the heterozygosity, for models where frequencies are widely dispersed, such as for selectively neutral mutations, contributions of epistatic variance are always small. Epistasis may be important in understanding the genetic architecture, for example, of function or human disease, but that does not imply that loci exhibiting it will contribute much genetic variance. Overall we conclude that theoretical predictions and experimental observations of low amounts of epistatic variance in outbred populations are concordant. It is not a likely source of missing heritability, for example, or major influence on predictions of rates of evolution.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  additive variance; epistasis; multilocus models; quantitative genetics; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990992      PMCID: PMC4174947          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

1.  The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability.

Authors:  Or Zuk; Eliana Hechter; Shamil R Sunyaev; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A century after Fisher: time for a new paradigm in quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Ronald M Nelson; Mats E Pettersson; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Armando Caballero; William G Hill; Aurora García-Dorado; Carlos López-Fanjul
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Teri A Manolio; Louis R Pasquale; Eric Boerwinkle; Neil Caporaso; Julie M Cunningham; Mariza de Andrade; Bjarke Feenstra; Eleanor Feingold; M Geoffrey Hayes; William G Hill; Maria Teresa Landi; Alvaro Alonso; Guillaume Lettre; Peng Lin; Hua Ling; William Lowe; Rasika A Mathias; Mads Melbye; Elizabeth Pugh; Marilyn C Cornelis; Bruce S Weir; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; R J Spelman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Genetic interactions affecting human gene expression identified by variance association mapping.

Authors:  Andrew Anand Brown; Alfonso Buil; Ana Viñuela; Tuuli Lappalainen; Hou-Feng Zheng; J Brent Richards; Kerrin S Small; Timothy D Spector; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross.

Authors:  Joshua S Bloom; Ian M Ehrenreich; Wesley T Loo; Thúy-Lan Võ Lite; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  67 in total

1.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Dominance genetic variation contributes little to the missing heritability for human complex traits.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhu; Andrew Bakshi; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Gibran Hemani; Sang Hong Lee; Ilja M Nolte; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk; Harold Snieder; Tonu Esko; Lili Milani; Reedik Mägi; Andres Metspalu; William G Hill; Bruce S Weir; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease.

Authors:  Frank W Albert; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  From R.A. Fisher's 1918 Paper to GWAS a Century Later.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Andrés Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Genotypic Context and Epistasis in Individuals and Populations.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Weak Epistasis May Drive Adaptation in Recombining Bacteria.

Authors:  Brian J Arnold; Michael U Gutmann; Yonatan H Grad; Samuel K Sheppard; Jukka Corander; Marc Lipsitch; William P Hanage
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Correlations between relatives: From Mendelian theory to complete genome sequence.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  CAGI4 Crohn's exome challenge: Marker SNP versus exome variant models for assigning risk of Crohn disease.

Authors:  Lipika R Pal; Kunal Kundu; Yizhou Yin; John Moult
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.