Literature DB >> 2025819

Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.

L D Saunders1, G Flowerdew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine (a) trends in the cesarean section rate in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988, (b) the contribution of different primary indications to the overall increase in the cesarean section rate and (c) trends in the cesarean section rate by residence of the mother.
DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth in acute care hospitals in Alberta during the study period. Indications for cesarean section were defined by a hierarchic classification system. Geographic regions were identified according to the mother's residence. MAIN
RESULTS: The crude cesarean section rate increased from 13.2 to 17.3 per 100 deliveries between 1979-80 and 1987-88. Previous cesarean section accounted for 54% of the increase, breech presentation for 17%, fetal distress for 17% and dystocia for 10%. The contribution of previous cesarean section was due to the substantial increase in the number of women presenting with a previous cesarean section. The cesarean section rate among women who had previously had the procedure decreased from 96.7% in 1979-80 to 84.6% in 1987-88. The crude cesarean section rates by region varied from 10.3 to 22.3 per 100 deliveries.
CONCLUSIONS: Further efforts to reduce the rate of cesarean section among women who have previously undergone the procedure are needed to control the rate of cesarean section in Alberta. Decreasing the rate of primary cesarean section is also an important goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2025819      PMCID: PMC1335177     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates.

Authors:  F C Notzon; P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  In-hospital maternal mortality in the United States: time trends and relation to method of delivery.

Authors:  D B Petitti; R C Cefalo; S Shapiro; P Whalley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Maternal death after cesarean section in Georgia.

Authors:  G L Rubin; H B Peterson; R W Rochat; B J McCarthy; J S Terry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  NIH Consensus Development Task force statement on cesarean childbirth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; M Orleans; S Langendoerfer; J McFee; J Murphy; H E Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

Authors:  S A Myers; N Gleicher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

Authors:  I M Kelso; R J Parsons; G F Lawrence; S S Arora; D K Edmonds; I D Cooke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.

Authors:  B S Merrill; C E Gibbs
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  S R Soliman; R F Burrows
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.

Authors:  S Iglesias; R Burn; L D Saunders
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.