Literature DB >> 3185675

A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

S A Myers1, N Gleicher.   

Abstract

Despite the consensus that national cesarean-section rates are excessive, they continue to rise. Currently, approximately one of every four deliveries is by cesarean section. We developed an initiative to reduce the number of cesarean deliveries to a rate of 11 percent of all deliveries at our inner-city hospital. Participation by attending physicians was voluntary and not linked to any sanction. The program included a stringent requirement for a second opinion, objective criteria for the four most common indications for cesarean section, and a detailed review of all cesarean sections and of individual physicians' rates of performing them. During the first two years of the program, the cesarean-section rate fell from 17.5 percent of 1697 deliveries in 1985 to 11.5 percent of 2301 deliveries in 1987 (P less than 0.05). The proportion of infants with five-minute Apgar scores lower than 7 increased from 3 percent in 1985 to 4.9 percent in 1987 (P less than 0.05), but neither the fetal mortality rate (11.9 per 1000) nor the neonatal mortality rate (11.2 per 1000) in 1987 differed significantly from the rates in 1985. A single maternal death, unrelated to cesarean delivery, occurred during the study. Rates of both primary and repeat cesarean sections decreased, although only the decline in the rate of primary cesarean sections, from 12 to 6.8 percent, was statistically significant (P less than 0.05). During the same period, operative vaginal deliveries (i.e., forceps deliveries and midpelvic procedures) declined from 10.4 to 4.3 percent (P less than 0.05) of total deliveries. We conclude that an initiative within an obstetrics department can reduce cesarean-section rates substantially without adverse effects on the outcome for mother or infant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3185675     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198812083192304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  20 in total

1.  Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?

Authors:  M McKee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

3.  Do first opinions affect second opinions?

Authors:  Geva Vashitz; Joseph S Pliskin; Yisrael Parmet; Yona Kosashvili; Gal Ifergane; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

6.  Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.

Authors:  P J Stewart; C Dulberg; A C Arnill; T Elmslie; P F Hall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  A S Basinski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  S R Soliman; R F Burrows
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.

Authors:  S Iglesias; R Burn; L D Saunders
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroll; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.