Literature DB >> 3807975

Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates.

F C Notzon, P J Placek, S M Taffel.   

Abstract

Our study of cesarean rates in 19 industrialized countries of Europe, North America, and the Pacific revealed sharp differences in rates, ranging from a low of 5 (Czechoslovakia) to a high of 18 (United States) per 100 hospital deliveries in 1981. Differences in cesarean rates according to maternal age, parity, and complications of pregnancy and childbirth reflected national differences in obstetrical practice. For example, the percentage of mothers who had a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section was only 5 in the United States as compared with 43 in Norway, where the cesarean rate was half that in the United States. Despite the wide range of cesarean rates, almost all the countries studied have had consistent increases over the past decade, and the annual rate of increase for all countries appears to be converging. The steady pace of increase in developed countries, combined with comparable or even higher rates of cesarean delivery now being reported in less developed countries, underscores the need for the medical community to consider the appropriateness of this continued rise in the number of cesarean deliveries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3807975     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198702123160706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  30 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  W W Cai; J S Marks; C H Chen; Y X Zhuang; L Morris; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Increased obstetric activity: a new meaning to "induced labour"?

Authors:  S Vallgårda
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Urban hospital cesarean section delivery rates in Paraíba State, Brazil, 1977-81.

Authors:  J Rodrigues
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Cesarean section, 1988--to have or have not!

Authors:  E J Quilligan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

9.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  C R Cardwell; L C Stene; G Joner; O Cinek; J Svensson; M J Goldacre; R C Parslow; P Pozzilli; G Brigis; D Stoyanov; B Urbonaite; S Sipetić; E Schober; C Ionescu-Tirgoviste; G Devoti; C E de Beaufort; K Buschard; C C Patterson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.