Literature DB >> 677195

An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

I M Kelso, R J Parsons, G F Lawrence, S S Arora, D K Edmonds, I D Cooke.   

Abstract

Intrapartum continuous fetal heart rate monitoring has been routinely performed at the Jessop Hospital for Women for some years. However, no controlled trials had ever been performed to show its advantages over intermittent auscultation in low-risk patients. A prospective randomized study of 504 patients compared continuous fetal heart rate monitoring with intermittent auscultation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in neonatal deaths, Apgar scores, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and cord blood gases. The cesarean section rate was significantly increased (p less than 0.05) in the monitored patients but this did not seem attributable to fetal monitoring. No beneficial or deleterious effects of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor were shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 677195     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  25 in total

Review 1.  Thirty years of electronic intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: discussion paper.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Declan Devane; Gillian Ml Gyte; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-03

3.  Electronic fetal monitoring in a small hospital. Part 2: intrapartum use.

Authors:  R I Casson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Inappropriate diabetes screening.

Authors:  S Roedde; J McLeod
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Periodic health examination, 1989 update: 4. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring and prevention of neonatal herpes simplex. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Fetal monitoring in labour.

Authors:  P W Howie
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-15

Review 8.  Cesarean section, 1988--to have or have not!

Authors:  E J Quilligan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

9.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey.

Authors:  B L Davies; P A Niday; C A Nimrod; E R Drake; A E Sprague; M J Trépanier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.