Literature DB >> 7078850

In-hospital maternal mortality in the United States: time trends and relation to method of delivery.

D B Petitti, R C Cefalo, S Shapiro, P Whalley.   

Abstract

To study time trends in maternal mortality in the United States and to attempt to compare the risk of cesarean with vaginal delivery, information from the Professional Activities Study of the Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities for 3 years-1970, 1974, and 1978-was reviewed. For all deliveries, mortality per 100,000 deliveries declined from 25.7 in 1970 to 14.3 in 1978. For vaginal deliveries, mortality per 100,000 deliveries declined from 20.4 to 9.8. For cesarean deliveries, mortality per 100,000 births decreased more than for vaginal deliveries, from 113.8 to 40.9. Mortality for deliveries with no mention of complications, lacerations, or uterine rupture declined significantly from 1970 to 1978. Mortality for deliveries complicated by dystocia or malpresentation declined significantly from 1970 to 1974, but failed to decline thereafter. Mortality for deliveries complicated by a previous cesarean or by antepartum hemorrhage did not decline significantly from 1970 to 1978. For all complications with a sufficient number of vaginal and cesarean deliveries, except deliveries complicated by malpresentation or antepartum hemorrhage, mortality was at least twice as high in cesarean as in vaginal deliveries. Based on a comparison of mortality after a previous cesarean with mortality for all vaginal deliveries with no complication, the authors conclude that cesarean delivery is probably neither less than 2 nor more than 4 times more hazardous than vaginal delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7078850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Influence of perinatal asphyxia on neurologic outcome: consequences for family practice accoucheurs.

Authors:  M Klein; J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  VBAC: Is It Safe for Your Patients?

Authors:  A J Reid
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China.

Authors:  Ma Runmei; Lao Terence T; Sun Yonghu; Xiao Hong; Tian Yuqin; Li Bailuan; Yang Minghui; Yang Weihong; Liang Kun; Liang Guohua; Li Hongyu; Geng Li; Ni Renmin; Qi Wenjin; Chen Zhuo; Du Mingyu; Zhu Bei; Xu Jing; Tao Yanping; Zhang Lan; Song Xianyan; Qu Zaiqing; Sun Qian; Yi Xiaoyun; Yu Jihui; Zhang Dandan
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Maternal mortality in British Columbia in 1971-86.

Authors:  B K Wittmann; K J Murphy; J F King; B H Yuen; D Shaw; A G Wittmann
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records.

Authors:  R L Williams; P M Chen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.

Authors:  L D Saunders; G Flowerdew
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?

Authors:  P Norman; S Kostovcik; A Lanning
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.