Literature DB >> 20228686

"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.

Elizabeth A Boyd1, Bernard Lo, Leah R Evans, Grace Malvar, Latifat Apatira, John M Luce, Douglas B White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Physicians and surrogate decision-makers for seriously ill patients often have different views of patients' prognoses. We sought to understand what sources of knowledge surrogates rely on when estimating a patient's prognosis.
DESIGN: Prospective, mixed-methods study using face-to-face, semistructured interviews with surrogate decision-makers.
SETTING: Four intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center in 2006 to 2007. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 179 surrogate decision-makers for 142 incapacitated, critically ill patients at high risk for death. MAIN
RESULTS: Less than 2% (3 of 179) of surrogates reported that their beliefs about the patients' prognoses hinged exclusively on prognostic information provided to them by physicians. The majority cited other factors in addition to physicians' predictions that also contributed to their beliefs about the patients' prognoses, including perceptions of the patient's individual strength of character and will to live; the patient's unique history of illness and survival; the surrogate's own observations of the patient's physical appearance; the surrogate's belief that their presence at the bedside may improve the prognosis; and the surrogate's optimism, intuition, and faith. For some surrogates, these other sources of knowledge superseded the importance of the physician's prognostication. However, most surrogates endeavored to balance their own knowledge of the patient with physicians' biomedical knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: Surrogates use diverse types of knowledge when estimating their loved ones' prognoses, including individualized attributes of the patient, such as their strength of character and life history, of which physicians may be unaware. Attention to these considerations may help clinicians identify and overcome disagreements about prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20228686      PMCID: PMC3530838          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  20 in total

1.  Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults.

Authors:  R Baker; A W Wu; J M Teno; B Kreling; A M Damiano; H R Rubin; M J Roach; N S Wenger; R S Phillips; N A Desbiens; A F Connors; W Knaus; J Lynn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Discrepancies between patient and physician estimates for the success of stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  S J Lee; D Fairclough; J H Antin; J C Weeks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  M K Giacomini; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.

Authors:  E Azoulay; S Chevret; G Leleu; F Pochard; M Barboteu; C Adrie; P Canoui; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making?

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Joan Tranmer; C J O'Callaghan; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; John O'Leary
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to".

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality.

Authors:  Graeme Rocker; Deborah Cook; Peter Sjokvist; Bruce Weaver; Simon Finfer; Ellen McDonald; John Marshall; Anne Kirby; Mitchell Levy; Peter Dodek; Daren Heyland; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  J A Kruse; M C Thill-Baharozian; R W Carlson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Brian R Clarridge; Virginia Casey; Lisa C Welch; Terrie Wetle; Renee Shield; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Integration of palliative care in chronic critical illness management.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Aluko A Hope
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  [Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  M Ratliff; J-O Neumann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  Setting the vision: applied patient-reported outcomes and smart, connected digital healthcare systems to improve patient-centered outcomes prediction in critical illness.

Authors:  Nicholas G Wysham; Amy P Abernethy; Christopher E Cox
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Racial differences in withdrawal of mechanical ventilation do not alter mortality in neurologically injured patients.

Authors:  Michael A Rubin; Rajat Dhar; Michael N Diringer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Living in hope and desperate for a miracle: NICU nurses perceptions of parental anguish.

Authors:  Janet Green
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2015-04

7.  Numeracy and Interpretation of Prognostic Estimates in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Surrogate Decision Makers in the Neurologic ICU.

Authors:  Nikita Leiter; Melissa Motta; Robert M Reed; Temitope Adeyeye; Debra L Wiegand; Nirav G Shah; Avelino C Verceles; Giora Netzer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  The Voice Is As Mighty As the Pen: Integrating Conversations into Advance Care Planning.

Authors:  Kunal Bailoor; Leslie H Kamil; Ed Goldman; Laura M Napiewocki; Denise Winiarski; Christian J Vercler; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Robert Gramling; Adam G Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Edward R Marcantonio; Roger B Davis; Robert A Cohen; Sushrut S Waikar; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.