Literature DB >> 23712681

Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists.

Melissa W Wachterman1, Edward R Marcantonio, Roger B Davis, Robert A Cohen, Sushrut S Waikar, Russell S Phillips, Ellen P McCarthy.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients undergoing hemodialysis have an annual mortality rate exceeding 20%, comparable to many types of cancer. Past research has shown that patients with cancer overestimate their likelihood of survival relative to their physicians, but this relationship has not been examined in patients with noncancer diagnoses. Perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy may influence goals of care.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the perceptions of hemodialysis patients and their nephrologists concerning prognosis and the likelihood of transplant; to follow actual survival; and to explore the relationship between patients' expectations and their goals of care.
DESIGN: We completed a medical record abstraction to estimate 1-year mortality risk among patients who underwent dialysis at any time from November 1, 2010, through September 1, 2011. We then conducted in-person interviews with eligible patients whose predicted 1-year mortality, based on validated prognostic tools, was at least 20%. We also interviewed their nephrologists. We compared patients' and physicians' expectations about 1- and 5-year survival and transplant candidacy and measured the association between patients' expectations and goals of care. We then followed actual survival using Kaplan-Meier methods. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two dialysis units in Boston. Two hundred seven patients undergoing hemodialysis included in the medical record review, with 62 eligible patients interviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted 1-year mortality risk using validated prognostic tools; actual survival; patients' and physicians' expectations about 1-year survival and likelihood of transplant; and patients' goals of care.
RESULTS: Of the 207 hemodialysis patients, 72.5% had a predicted 1-year mortality of at least 20%. Of the 80 patients eligible for interview, 62 participated (response rate, 78%). Patients were significantly more optimistic than their nephrologists about 1- and 5-year survival (P < .001 for both) and were more likely to think they were transplant candidates (37 [66%] vs 22 [39%] [P = .008]). Of the 81% of patients reporting a 90% chance or greater of being alive at 1 year, 18 (44%) preferred care focused on extending life, even if it meant more discomfort, compared with 1 (9%) among patients reporting a lower chance of survival (P = .045). Actual survival was 93% at 1 year but decreased to 79% by 17 months and 56% by 23 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hemodialysis patients are more optimistic about prognosis and transplant candidacy than their nephrologists. In our sample, patients' expectations about 1-year survival were more accurate than those of their nephrologists, but their longer-term survival expectations dramatically overestimated even their 2-year survival rates. Patients' prognostic expectations are associated with their treatment preferences. Our findings suggest the need for interventions to help providers communicate effectively with patients about prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712681      PMCID: PMC3982381          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  39 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline on shared decision-making in the appropriate initiation of and withdrawal from dialysis. The Renal Physicians Association and the American Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  John H Galla
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Ethical considerations in end-of-life care and research.

Authors:  David Casarett
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  A simple comorbidity scale predicts clinical outcomes and costs in dialysis patients.

Authors:  S Beddhu; F J Bruns; M Saul; P Seddon; M L Zeidel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life.

Authors:  E B Lamont; N A Christakis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Power and limitations of daily prognostications of death in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  William Meadow; Anne Pohlman; Laura Frain; Yaya Ren; John Paul Kress; Winnie Teuteberg; Jesse Hall
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.

Authors:  E Azoulay; S Chevret; G Leleu; F Pochard; M Barboteu; C Adrie; P Canoui; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Predicting 1 year mortality in an outpatient haemodialysis population: a comparison of comorbidity instruments.

Authors:  Dana C Miskulin; Alice A Martin; Richard Brown; Nancy E Fink; Josef Coresh; Neil R Powe; Philip G Zager; Klemens B Meyer; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Patterns of functional decline at the end of life.

Authors:  June R Lunney; Joanne Lynn; Daniel J Foley; Steven Lipson; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  81 in total

1.  Achieving a person-centered approach to dialysis discontinuation: An historical perspective.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; Emma Murphy; Catherine R Butler; Claire A Richards
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  The role of palliative care in population management and accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Grant Smith; Rachelle Bernacki; Susan D Block
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  The Ethics of Chronic Dialysis for the Older Patient: Time to Reevaluate the Norms.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Keith M Swetz; Robert C Albright
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  The missing piece: Clinical pharmacists enhancing the interprofessional nephrology clinic model.

Authors:  Chelsea E Hawley; Laura K Triantafylidis; Julie M Paik
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2019-06-21

5.  Racial Disparities in End-of-Life Communication and Preferences among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Authors:  Nwamaka D Eneanya; Julia B Wenger; Katherine Waite; Stanley Crittenden; Derya B Hazar; Angelo Volandes; Jennifer S Temel; Ravi Thadhani; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.754

6.  Prediction of Risk of Death for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan T Anderson; Hailey Cleek; Atieh S Pajouhi; M Fernanda Bellolio; Ananya Mayukha; Allyson Hart; LaTonya J Hickson; Molly A Feely; Michael E Wilson; Ryan M Giddings Connolly; Patricia J Erwin; Abdul M Majzoub; Navdeep Tangri; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.

Authors:  Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Mistrust, misperceptions, and miscommunication: a qualitative study of preferences about kidney transplantation among African Americans.

Authors:  M W Wachterman; E P McCarthy; E R Marcantonio; M Ersek
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Age and sex disparities in discussions about kidney transplantation in adults undergoing dialysis.

Authors:  Megan L Salter; Mara A McAdams-Demarco; Andrew Law; Rebecca J Kamil; Lucy A Meoni; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.