Literature DB >> 10966293

Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.

E Azoulay1, S Chevret, G Leleu, F Pochard, M Barboteu, C Adrie, P Canoui, J R Le Gall, B Schlemmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication of simple, clear information to families of intensive care unit (ICU) patients is a vital component of quality care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with poor comprehension by family members of the status of ICU patients.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University-affiliated medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients admitted to an ICU for >2 days. INTERVENTION: The representatives of 76 patients who were visited by at least one person during their ICU stay were interviewed.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54+/-17 yrs and mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II at admission was 40+/-20. The representative was the spouse in 47 cases (62%). Among representatives, 25 (33%) were of foreign descent and 12 (16%) did not speak French. Mean duration of the first meeting with a physician was 10+/-6 mins. In 34 cases (54%), the representative failed to comprehend the diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment of the patient. Factors associated with poor comprehension by representatives included patient-related, family-related, and physician-related factors. Patient-related factors included age <50 yrs (p = .03), unemployment (p = .01), referral from a hematology or oncology ward (p = .006), admission for acute respiratory failure (p = .005) or coma (p = .01), and a relatively favorable prognosis (p = .04). Family-related factors were foreign descent (p = .007), no knowledge of French (p = .03), representative not the spouse (p = .03), and no healthcare professional in the family (p = .01). Physician-related factors were first meeting with representative <10 mins (p = .03) and failure to give the representative an information brochure (p = .02). Moreover, after the first meeting, caregivers accurately predicted poor comprehension by representatives (p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient information is frequently not communicated effectively to family members by ICU physicians. Physicians should strive to identify patients and families who require special attention and to determine how their personal style of interrelating with family members may impair communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966293     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  133 in total

Review 1.  Withdrawing life support and resolution of conflict with families.

Authors:  Jenny Way; Anthony L Back; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

2.  A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Leah R Evans; Grace L Malvar; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Emotional strain, communication, and satisfaction of family members in the intensive care unit compared with expectations of the medical staff: experiences from a Norwegian University Hospital.

Authors:  Hilde Myhren; Øivind Ekeberg; Ingrid Langen; Olav Stokland
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Examining the root cause of surrogate conflicts in the intensive care unit and general wards.

Authors:  Allison Neyhart Rubin; Katrina A Bramstedt
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2010-03

5.  Physicians just need to be better trained to provide the best care at the end-of-life.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Jefferson P Piva
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Friederike Quittnat Pelletier; Maedean Brown; Cheryl Ethier; David Wells; Lisa Burry; Rod MacDonald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  You Can't Get What You Want: Innovation for End-of-Life Communication in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Margaret L Schwarze; Toby C Campbell; Thomas V Cunningham; Douglas B White; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Latifat Apatira; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Leah R Evans; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).

Authors:  K E A Burns; L Rizvi; O M Smith; Y Lee; J Lee; M Wang; M Brown; M Parker; A Premji; D Leung; M Hammond Mobilio; L Gotlib-Conn; R Nisenbaum; M Santos; Y Li; S Mehta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.