Literature DB >> 14511159

Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Terri R Fried1, Elizabeth H Bradley, John O'Leary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine agreement between patients, caregivers, and clinicians regarding prognosis communication and to examine patients' and caregivers' desire for prognostic information.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen persons aged 60 and older with a limited life expectancy secondary to cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; caregivers; and clinicians. MEASUREMENTS: Patient-clinician and caregiver-clinician agreement about the occurrence of prognosis discussions and patient and caregiver desire for prognostic information.
RESULTS: In 46% of patient/clinician and 34% of caregiver/clinician pairs, the clinician reported saying that the patient could die of the underlying disease, whereas the patient or caregiver reported no discussion. In 23% of patient/clinician and 30% of patient/caregiver pairs, the clinician reported discussing an approximate life expectancy, whereas the patient or caregiver reported no discussion. Of 205 patients who reported no life expectancy discussion, 40% did not want this discussion. Whereas 83% of those believing they had 1 year or less to live wanted to discuss prognosis, 79% of those believing they had 1 to 2 years, 53% of those believing they had 2 to 5 years, and 50% of those believing they had more than 5 years or who were unwilling to answer wanted this discussion (P=.007).
CONCLUSION: Although clinicians report that they are discussing prognosis, patients and caregivers frequently do not corroborate these reports. Furthermore, many patients do not want prognostic information. Despite previous reports concluding that patients want full disclosure about their illness, many seriously ill older persons and caregivers may not be ready or able to receive prognostic information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14511159     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51457.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  98 in total

1.  Update in palliative care--2011.

Authors:  Patricia F Harris; Robert M Arnold; Ursula K Braun; Erik Fromme; Rahwa Ghermay; Stephanie Harman; Robert L Jayes; Anne M Walling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Internal medicine trainee self-assessments of end-of-life communication skills do not predict assessments of patients, families, or clinician-evaluators.

Authors:  Robert P Dickson; Ruth A Engelberg; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Matthew E Modes; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Elizabeth L Nielsen; J Randall Curtis; Erin K Kross
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  How long can I go on like this? Dying from cardiorespiratory disease.

Authors:  Richard Lehman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Communication about chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Alice F Mercado; Sharon L Camhi; Nidhi Tandon; Sylvan Wallenstein; Gary I August; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-10

8.  Views of patients with heart failure about their role in the decision to start implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment: prescription rather than participation.

Authors:  Anders Agård; Rurik Löfmark; Nils Edvardsson; Inger Ekman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Every patient is an individual: clinicians balance individual factors when discussing prognosis with diverse frail elderly adults.

Authors:  Julie N Thai; Louise C Walter; Catherine Eng; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Using the experiences of bereaved caregivers to inform patient- and caregiver-centered advance care planning.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; John R O'Leary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.