Literature DB >> 10891968

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

M K Giacomini1, D J Cook.   

Abstract

Quantitative research is designed to test well-specified hypotheses, determine whether an intervention did more harm than good, and find out how much a risk factor predisposes persons to disease. Equally important, qualitative research offers insight into emotional and experiential phenomena in health care to determine what, how, and why. There are 4 essential aspects of qualitative analysis. First, the participant selection must be well reasoned and their inclusion must be relevant to the research question. Second, the data collection methods must be appropriate for the research objectives and setting. Third, the data collection process, which includes field observation, interviews, and document analysis, must be comprehensive enough to support rich and robust descriptions of the observed events. Fourth, the data must be appropriately analyzed and the findings adequately corroborated by using multiple sources of information, more than 1 investigator to collect and analyze the raw data, member checking to establish whether the participants' viewpoints were adequately interpreted, or by comparison with existing social science theories. Qualitative studies offer an alternative when insight into the research is not well established or when conventional theories seem inadequate. JAMA. 2000;284:357-362

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10891968     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.3.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  247 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Authors:  L Rychetnik; M Frommer; P Hawe; A Shiell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications.

Authors:  R J Haber; L A Lingard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Transferability of principles of evidence based medicine to improve educational quality: systematic review and case study of an online course in primary health care.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Peter Toon; Jill Russell; Geoff Wong; Liz Plumb; Fraser Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-18

4.  Why medicine still needs a scientific foundation: restating the hypotheticodeductive model - part two.

Authors:  Kevork Hopayian
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  A Rhodes; R P Moreno; E Azoulay; M Capuzzo; J D Chiche; J Eddleston; R Endacott; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; R Kuhlen; C León-Gil; M C Martin Delgado; P G Metnitz; M Soares; C L Sprung; J F Timsit; A Valentin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Modesty and recognition--a qualitative study of the lived experience of recovery from anal cancer.

Authors:  Julie Midtgaard; Mette Juel Hansen; Birgitte Grandjean
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Ebola preparedness: a rapid needs assessment of critical care in a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Aimee J Sarti; Stephanie Sutherland; Nicholas Robillard; John Kim; Kirsten Dupuis; Mary Thornton; Marlene Mansour; Pierre Cardinal
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Preferred Physical Characteristics of Vaginal Film Microbicides for HIV Prevention in Pittsburgh Women.

Authors:  Maria D Fan; Lindsay F Kramzer; Sharon L Hillier; Judy C Chang; Leslie A Meyn; Lisa C Rohan
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-08-29

9.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Latifat Apatira; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Leah R Evans; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.