Literature DB >> 26916138

Beyond the dose-limiting toxicity period: Dermatologic adverse events of patients on phase 1 trials of the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program.

Alexander Drilon1,2, Anne A Eaton1, Katja Schindler3, Mrinal M Gounder1,2, David R Spriggs1,2, Pamela Harris4, S Percy Ivy4, Alexia Iasonos1, Mario E Lacouture1, David M Hyman1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) can be key determinants of overall drug tolerability and of the maximum tolerated and recommended phase 2 doses in phase 1 trials. The authors present the largest dedicated analysis of dermatologic AEs on phase 1 trials to date.
METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained database of patients with solid tumors who were enrolled onto Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program (CTEP)-sponsored phase 1 trials of cytotoxic or molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) from 2000 to 2010 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence, site, and type of drug-related dermatologic AEs were described and compared. The timing of worst drug-related dermatologic AEs was summarized.
RESULTS: In total, 3517 patients with solid tumors and 6165 unique, drug-related dermatologic AEs were analyzed, including 1545 patients on MTA-only trials, 671 on cytotoxic-only trials, and 1392 on combination MTA and cytotoxic trials. Of 1270 patients who had drug-related dermatologic events, the timing of the worst AE was as follows: 743 (cycle 1), 303 (cycle 2), and 224 (cycle 3 or later). Although the cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 drug-related AEs increased to 2.4% by cycle 6, it was only 1.6% at the end of cycle 1. The cumulative incidence of drug-related AEs was highest in patients who received MTA-only therapy (P < .001) and differed by dose level (P < .001). In patients who received MTA-only therapy, drug-related AEs were most common for combination kinase inhibitor-containing therapy (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of drug-related dermatologic AEs occur after the traditional dose-limiting toxicity monitoring period of phase 1 clinical trials. Future designs should account for late toxicities.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program (CTEP); dermatologic toxicity; dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period; molecularly targeted agents; phase 1 trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26916138      PMCID: PMC5479632          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Sarah Zohar; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Challenges in combining novel molecularly targeted agents in cancer medicine.

Authors:  T A Yap
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Targeted therapies: redefining the primary objective of phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Nomogram to predict cycle-one serious drug-related toxicity in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  David M Hyman; Anne A Eaton; Mrinal M Gounder; Gary L Smith; Erika G Pamer; Martee L Hensley; David R Spriggs; Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A new approach to integrate toxicity grade and repeated treatment cycles in the analysis and reporting of phase I dose-finding trials.

Authors:  A Doussau; R Thiébaut; B Geoerger; P Schöffski; A Floquet; M C Le Deley; S Mathoulin-Pélissier; E Rizzo; P Fumoleau; C Le Tourneau; X Paoletti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Completeness in the reporting of dermatologic adverse drug reactions associated with monoclonal antibody epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in phase II and III colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bauer; Scott Hammerman; Bernardo Rapoport; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 8.  Dermatologic adverse events associated with afatinib: an oral ErbB family blocker.

Authors:  Mario E Lacouture; Dirk Schadendorf; Chia-Yu Chu; Martina Uttenreuther-Fischer; Uz Stammberger; Dennis O'Brien; Axel Hauschild
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti; Elisa Rizzo; Christophe Massard; David Olmos; Camilla Fowst; Bernard Levy; Pierre Mancini; Denis Lacombe; Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Christophe Le Tourneau; Lillian L Siu; Stan B Kaye; Jaap Verweij; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of high-risk drugs related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials.

Authors:  Shun Kishimoto; Nobu Oshima; Matthew Rinker; Murali C Krishna; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Potential utility of a longitudinal relative dose intensity of molecularly targeted agents in phase 1 dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Kan Yonemori; Fumie Kinoshita; Yumiko Kobayashi; Hitomi S Okuma; Asuka Kawachi; Kenji Tamura; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Larry Rubinstein; Pamela Jo Harris; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  Delayed adverse events in phase I trials of molecularly targeted and cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Emma J Jordan; James Spicer; Debashis Sarker
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.