Literature DB >> 20204945

Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Pagona Roussi1, Kerry Anne Sherman, Suzanne Miller, Joanne Buzaglo, Mary Daly, Alan Taylor, Eric Ross, Andrew Godwin.   

Abstract

This randomised controlled trial evaluated the impact of an enhanced counselling (EC) intervention on knowledge about the heritability of breast and ovarian cancer and distress, as a function of BRCA test result, among high-risk women. Before deciding about whether or not to undergo genetic testing, participants were randomly assigned to the EC intervention (N = 69), designed to promote cognitive and affective processing of cancer risk information (following the standard individualised counselling session), or to the control condition (N = 65), which involved standard individualised counselling followed by a general health information session to control for time and attention. Women in the EC group exhibited greater knowledge than women in the control group, 1 week after the intervention. Further, at the affective level, the intervention was found to be the most beneficial for women testing positive: specifically 1 week after test result disclosure, women in the intervention group who tested positive experienced lower levels of distress than women in the control group who tested positive. The findings suggest that the design of counselling aids should include a component that explicitly activates the individual's cognitive-affective processing system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204945      PMCID: PMC2866521          DOI: 10.1080/08870440802660884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  34 in total

Review 1.  The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.

Authors:  S Sinharay; H S Stern; D Russell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; France Légaré; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

3.  Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Aad Tibben; Christi J van Asperen; Wilma Otten
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Impact of BRCA1 testing on women with cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  M E Wood; L Mullineaux; A K Rahm; D Fairclough; L Wenzel
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2000

7.  Pre-counseling education materials for BRCA testing: does tailoring make a difference?

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Joellen M Schildkraut; Donald Berry; Brian Calingaert; P Kelly Marcom; Jeremy Sugarman; Eric P Winer; J Dirk Iglehart; P Andrew Futreal; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002

8.  Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002

9.  What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  No news is (not necessarily) good news: impact of preliminary results for BRCA1 mutation searches.

Authors:  Alison Bish; Stephen Sutton; Christine Jacobs; Sara Levene; Amanda Ramirez; Shirley Hodgson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cancer patients' fears related to clinical trial participation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Alexis Koskan; Kristen J Wells; Luis E Gonzalez; Cathy D Meade; Christie L Pratt Pozo; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Karen Hurley; Mary B Daly; Andrew Godwin; Joanne S Buzaglo; Kuang-Yi Wen
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-14

3.  Effects of a randomized trial comparing standard and enhanced counseling for men at high risk of prostate cancer as a function of race and monitoring style.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller; Veda N Giri; Elias Obeid; Kuang-Yi Wen; Erin K Tagai; John Scarpato; Laura Gross; Gem Roy
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-10-10

4.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 7.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

8.  Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Laura-Kate Shaw; Karen Cavanagh; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10

9.  The Clinical Significance of Unknown Sequence Variants in BRCA Genes.

Authors:  Valentina Calò; Loredana Bruno; Laura La Paglia; Marco Perez; Naomi Margarese; Francesca Di Gaudio; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Quality of Life and Psychological State in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Who Received BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Jiajia Qiu; Jiaqin Guan; Xiaochen Yang; Jiong Wu; Guangyu Liu; Genhong Di; Canming Chen; Yifeng Hou; Qixia Han; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Zhen Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.