Literature DB >> 12394348

No news is (not necessarily) good news: impact of preliminary results for BRCA1 mutation searches.

Alison Bish1, Stephen Sutton, Christine Jacobs, Sara Levene, Amanda Ramirez, Shirley Hodgson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many women who have had breast or ovarian cancer who are undergoing tests for the presence of germline mutations in the genes will receive a result that is inconclusive. As this continuing uncertainty may have a detrimental effect on their psychological well-being and it is possible that such results will be misinterpreted as indicating that no mutation is present, studying their effect is important.
METHODS: Sixty-one women undergoing such tests completed questionnaires 2 weeks after their blood was taken and at 1 week and 6 months after receiving a preliminary "inconclusive" result, i.e., indicating that two thirds of the gene had been tested and no mutation had been found so far.
RESULTS: Perceived likelihood of having a mutation and perceptions of cancer risk significantly decreased after receipt of the interim result. There were no changes in levels of psychological distress and worry about cancer, in intentions to have mammograms, to carry out breast self-examination, or to have prophylactic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuing uncertainty does not seem to have increased distress; however, it is possible that the inconclusive result is being interpreted as a "good news" result, in view of the fact that perceptions of risk decrease after receipt of the result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394348     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200209000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  9 in total

Review 1.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry Anne Sherman; Suzanne Miller; Joanne Buzaglo; Mary Daly; Alan Taylor; Eric Ross; Andrew Godwin
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04

4.  Distress and psychosocial needs of a heterogeneous high risk familial cancer population.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John W Robinson; Peter Bridge; Francois P Bernier; Dawna M Gilchrist
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Cognitive and emotional factors predicting decisional conflict among high-risk breast cancer survivors who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results.

Authors:  Christine Rini; Suzanne C O'Neill; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel E Goldsmith; Lina Jandorf; Karen Brown; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Breast cancer in the young: role of the geneticist.

Authors:  Ashley H Woodson; Jessica L Profato; Kimberly I Muse; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Physician trust moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cancer worry interference among women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torbit; Jenna J Albiani; Melyssa Aronson; Spring Holter; Kara Semotiuk; Zane Cohen; Tae L Hart
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.