Literature DB >> 28810355

Effects of a randomized trial comparing standard and enhanced counseling for men at high risk of prostate cancer as a function of race and monitoring style.

Pagona Roussi1, Suzanne M Miller2,3, Veda N Giri4, Elias Obeid3, Kuang-Yi Wen2,3, Erin K Tagai2,3, John Scarpato2,3, Laura Gross4, Gem Roy2,3.   

Abstract

Despite conflicting guidelines, a significant subset of high-risk men decide to undergo routine prostate cancer screening. Yet, there is a scarcity of available programs, and no studies evaluating interventions to support men in dealing with the psychosocial impact of screening. In this study, one of the first to explore the responses of high-risk men enrolling in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program ( N = 128), patients underwent a prostate cancer risk counseling visit immediately followed by either a cognitive-affective preparation session designed to help them process the information they received or a general health education session. All men in this self-selected sample chose to participate in prostate cancer screening. Men were assessed 3 weeks and 6 months post-counseling. The impact of the enhanced counseling condition on knowledge, perceived risk, expectancies, and intrusive ideation was a function of racial and coping style group. Implications for tailored interventions to maximize preparedness for risk and screening counseling are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African-American men; cognitive outcomes; intrusive ideation; monitoring; prostate cancer screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28810355      PMCID: PMC5561513          DOI: 10.1177/1359105316671188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  27 in total

1.  Risk perception, screening practice and interest in genetic testing among unaffected men in families with hereditary prostate cancer.

Authors:  O Bratt; J E Damber; M Emanuelsson; U Kristoffersson; R Lundgren; H Olsson; H Grönberg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-02

Review 3.  Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Demographics, family histories, and psychological characteristics of prostate carcinoma screening participants.

Authors:  K L Taylor; J DiPlacido; W H Redd; K Faccenda; L Greer; A Perlmutter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Differences between African American and Caucasian men participating in a community-based prostate cancer screening program.

Authors:  K R Barber; R Shaw; M Folts; D K Taylor; A Ryan; M Hughes; V Scott; R R Abbott
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1998-12

7.  Impact of undergoing prostate carcinoma screening on prostate carcinoma-related knowledge and distress.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Rebecca Shelby; Jon Kerner; William Redd; John Lynch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prostate cancer screening behavior in men from seven ethnic groups: the fear factor.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Amy H Morgenstern; Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi; Carol Magai; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Racial/ethnic differences in lifestyle-related factors and prostate cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Song-Yi Park; Christopher A Haiman; Iona Cheng; Sungshim Lani Park; Lynne R Wilkens; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perceptions of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on pre-operative education in China: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Qiqi Zhuo; Hongmin Liang; Yangjuan Bai; Qiulan Hu; Ardani Latifah Hanum; Mingfang Yang; Yanjiao Wang; Wei Wei; Lan Ding; Fang Ma
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Chinese Version of Miller Behavioral Style Scale.

Authors:  Qiqi Zhuo; Changsheng Cui; Hongmin Liang; Yangjuan Bai; Qiulan Hu; Ardani Latifah Hanum; Mingfang Yang; Yanjiao Wang; Wei Wei; Lan Ding; Fang Ma
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Maladaptive coping with the infodemic and sleep disturbance in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Cecilia Cheng; Omid V Ebrahimi; Yan-Ching Lau
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.296

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.