Literature DB >> 21756124

Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Pagona Roussi1, Kerry A Sherman, Suzanne M Miller, Karen Hurley, Mary B Daly, Andrew Godwin, Joanne S Buzaglo, Kuang-Yi Wen.   

Abstract

Based on the cognitive-social health information processing model, we identified cognitive profiles of women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Prior to genetic counselling, participants (N = 171) completed a study questionnaire concerning their cognitive and affective responses to being at genetic risk. Using cluster analysis, four cognitive profiles were generated: (a) high perceived risk/low coping; (b) low value of screening/high expectancy of cancer; (c) moderate perceived risk/moderate efficacy of prevention/low informativeness of test result; and (d) high efficacy of prevention/high coping. The majority of women in Clusters One, Two and Three had no personal history of cancer, whereas Cluster Four consisted almost entirely of women affected with cancer. Women in Cluster One had the highest number of affected relatives and experienced higher levels of distress than women in the other three clusters. These results highlight the need to consider the psychological profile of women undergoing genetic testing when designing counselling interventions and messages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21756124      PMCID: PMC3197930          DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2010.521938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  36 in total

Review 1.  One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; B Glassman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

2.  Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats.

Authors:  S M Miller; M Rodoletz; C E Mangan; C M Schroeder; T V Sedlacek
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Decision making and decision support for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Kenneth P Tercyak; Kathryn L Taylor; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Psychological, behavioral, and family characteristics of pediatric patients with chronic pain: a 1-year retrospective study and cluster analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Scharff; Nicole Langan; Nancy Rotter; Jennifer Scott-Sutherland; Clorinda Schenck; Neil Tayor; Lori McDonald-Nolan; Bruce Masek
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Decision making about prophylactic oophorectomy among at-risk women: psychological influences and implications.

Authors:  S M Miller; C Y Fang; S L Manne; P F Engstrom; M B Daly
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Herman F J ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Finding groups using model-based cluster analysis: heterogeneous emotional self-regulatory processes and heavy alcohol use risk.

Authors:  Eun Young Mun; Alexander von Eye; Marsha E Bates; Evgeny G Vaschillo
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors predicting adherence to risk management behaviors of women at increased risk for developing lymphedema.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Alan Taylor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Lisa L Shah; Kaitlyn Jones; Brenda Rocha; Megan Doerr; Emily Gabitzsch; Thad Meese
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Emotional impact on the results of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test: an observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Sara Mella; Barbara Muzzatti; Riccardo Dolcetti; Maria Antonietta Annunziata
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.857

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.