Literature DB >> 12875584

Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.

Ingeborg Hochmair1, Wolfgang Arnold, Peter Nopp, Claude Jolly, Joachim Müller, Peter Roland.   

Abstract

Morphological examination of the human temporal bone in the apical region supports the benefits of deep electrode insertion. Initiation of spikes on peripheral processes close to the basilar membrane would provide improved channel selectivity during electrical stimulation but recruiting of nerve fibres requires a higher current. A clinical study was performed on 10 users of the MED-EL COMBI 40 + implant to evaluate the effect of the insertion depth of the cochlear implant electrode on speech perception. All subjects were implanted with the standard COMBI 40 + electrode with an insertion depth of > 30 mm. Acute speech tests were carried out in which stimulation was restricted to the apical, middle and basal regions of the cochlea in turn, and using electrode arrangements in which contacts were either distributed over the whole length of the cochlea or concentrated at the basal end, thus mimicking an insertion depth of approximately 20 mm only. The results showed that stimulation of the apical region of the cochlea supports a significant degree of speech understanding, and that distributing the contacts over the whole length of the cochlea improves speech perception in quiet and in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12875584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  42 in total

1.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

Authors:  J Müller; J Helms
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Mathieu Gani; Gregory Valentini; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-11

3.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Alejandro Rivas; Ahmet Cakir; Jacob B Hunter; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; George B Wanna; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  The importance of being flexible.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Partial withdrawal of deeply inserted cochlear electrodes: observations of two patients.

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Colette Boex; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Deep round window insertion versus standard approach in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Karl Fredrik Nordfalk; Kjell Rasmussen; Marie Bunne; Greg Eigner Jablonski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Cochlear duct length and cochlear distance on preoperative CT: imaging markers for estimating insertion depth angle of cochlear implant electrode.

Authors:  Jiseon Oh; Jung-Eun Cheon; Junghoan Park; Young Hun Choi; Yeon Jin Cho; Seunghyun Lee; Seung Ha Oh; Su-Mi Shin; Sun-Won Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; René H Gifford; Alejandro Rivas; David S Haynes; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.

Authors:  Stefan Brill; Joachim Müller; Rudolf Hagen; Alexander Möltner; Steffi-Johanna Brockmeier; Thomas Stark; Silke Helbig; Jan Maurer; Thomas Zahnert; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp; Ilona Anderson; Stefan Strahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.