Literature DB >> 20203477

Understandings of basic genetics in the United States: results from a national survey of black and white men and women.

K D Christensen1, T E Jayaratne, J S Roberts, S L R Kardia, E M Petty.   

Abstract

AIM: This study examined understandings of basic genetic concepts among Americans.
METHOD: In a national telephone survey of 1,200 Americans with equal representation among Black and White men and women, subjects responded to 8 items developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts that assessed understanding of basic concepts in multiple domains, including inheritance, genetics and race, and genetics and behavior.
RESULTS: Over 70% of subjects responded correctly on items about the genetic similarity of identical twins and siblings. Less than half of subjects responded correctly on all other items. Understanding of genetics was lowest in three areas: types/locations of genes in the body (29% correct), a genetic basis for race (25% correct), and the influence of single genes on behaviors (24% correct). Logistic regression models controlling for age and education showed some differences by race and gender on specific items but also showed that understandings are generally similar across these groups.
CONCLUSION: Misunderstandings about genetics are common among Black and White American men and women. Responses appear to reflect personal experiences, group values and interests. These findings emphasize the need for initiatives to improve the public's genetic literacy as well as a need for further investigation in this domain.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203477      PMCID: PMC3025896          DOI: 10.1159/000293287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  31 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Toni Antonucci; John Van Hoewyk
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

3.  Development of a knowledge scale about breast cancer and heredity (BCHK).

Authors:  N Ondrusek; E Warner; V Goel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race.

Authors:  Audrey Smedley; Brian D Smedley
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005-01

5.  Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample.

Authors:  K A Donovan; D C Tucker
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-02

6.  Family history and perceived vulnerability to some common diseases: a study of young people and their parents.

Authors:  M Ponder; J Lee; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics.

Authors:  Lori H Erby; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.

Authors:  C Molster; T Charles; A Samanek; P O'Leary
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  The Perennial Debate: Nature, Nurture, or Choice? Black and White Americans' Explanations for Individual Differences.

Authors:  Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Susan A Gelman; Merle Feldbaum; Jane P Sheldon; Elizabeth M Petty; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  Rev Gen Psychol       Date:  2009-03-01

Review 10.  Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge.

Authors:  Chris M R Smerecnik; Ilse Mesters; Nanne K de Vries; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

2.  Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Melinda Krakow; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.

Authors:  S M Fitzgerald-Butt; A Bodine; K M Fry; J Ash; A N Zaidi; V Garg; C A Gerhardt; K L McBride
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: views of underserved communities.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Christopher D Hartmann; Laura Morello; Sanjur Brooks; Kari Colón-Zimmermann; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-03-15

5.  Cultural beliefs on disease causation in the Philippines: challenge and implications in genetic counseling.

Authors:  Peter James B Abad; Michael L Tan; Melissa Mae P Baluyot; Angela Q Villa; Gay Luz Talapian; Ma Elouisa Reyes; Riza Concordia Suarez; Aster Lynn D Sur; Vanessa Dyan R Aldemita; Carmencita David Padilla; Mercy Ygona Laurino
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-07-16

6.  Use of a Qualitative Story Deck to Create Scenarios and Uncover Factors Associated with African American Participation in Genomics Research.

Authors:  Susan R Passmore; Amelia M Jamison; Moaz Abdelwadoud; Taylor B Rogers; Morgan Wiggan; Daniel C Mullins; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2020-12-30

7.  Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.

Authors:  Samantha A Streicher; Saskia C Sanderson; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Michael Diefenbach; Meg Smirnoff; Inga Peter; Carol R Horowitz; Barbara Brenner; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-06-07

8.  Information-seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Jill Powell; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A Qualitative Study of Anticipated Decision Making around Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing: the Role of Scientifically Concordant and Discordant Expectations.

Authors:  Alicia G Carmichael; Bailey B Hulswit; Emily J Moe; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Genetic Knowledge Among Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Laura Scheinfeldt; Ruixue Zhaoyang; Rachel Kasper; Kevin Sweet; Erynn S Gordon; Margaret Keller; Cathy Stack; Neda Gharani; Mary B Daly; Joseph Jarvis; Michael F Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.