Literature DB >> 26032340

Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults.

S M Fitzgerald-Butt1,2,3, A Bodine4, K M Fry1, J Ash5, A N Zaidi6, V Garg1,2,3, C A Gerhardt3,7, K L McBride1,3.   

Abstract

Basic knowledge of genetics is essential for understanding genetic testing and counseling. The lack of a written, English language, validated, published measure has limited our ability to evaluate genetic knowledge of patients and families. Here, we begin the psychometric analysis of a true/false genetic knowledge measure. The 18-item measure was completed by parents of children with congenital heart defects (CHD) (n = 465) and adolescents and young adults with CHD (age: 15-25, n = 196) with a mean total correct score of 12.6 [standard deviation (SD) = 3.5, range: 0-18]. Utilizing exploratory factor analysis, we determined that one to three correlated factors, or abilities, were captured by our measure. Through confirmatory factor analysis, we determined that the two factor model was the best fit. Although it was necessary to remove two items, the remaining items exhibited adequate psychometric properties in a multidimensional item response theory analysis. Scores for each factor were computed, and a sum-score conversion table was derived. We conclude that this genetic knowledge measure discriminates best at low knowledge levels and is therefore well suited to determine a minimum adequate amount of genetic knowledge. However, further reliability testing and validation in diverse research and clinical settings is needed.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  factor analysis, statistical; genetic testing; health knowledge, attitudes, and practice; heart defects, congenital; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26032340      PMCID: PMC5215811          DOI: 10.1111/cge.12618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  22 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Toni Antonucci; John Van Hoewyk
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

2.  Maternal attitudes and knowledge about newborn screening.

Authors:  Patricia Newcomb; Barbara True; Judith Walsh; Maynard Dyson; Suzanne Lockwood; Becky Douglas
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.412

3.  Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.

Authors:  Joan L Bottorff; Pamela A Ratner; Lynda G Balneaves; Chris G Richardson; Mary McCullum; Tom Hack; Karen Chalmers; Jane Buxton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Jennifer Klima; Kelly Kelleher; Deena Chisolm; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic testing and Parkinson disease: assessment of patient knowledge, attitudes, and interest.

Authors:  Dana Clay Falcone; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Sharon X Xie; Andrew Siderowf; Vivianna M Van Deerlin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts?

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Karen W Cullen; Theresa Nicklas; Deborah Thompson; Janice Baranowski
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-10

8.  Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

9.  The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics.

Authors:  Lori H Erby; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a two year follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Hiske Calsbeek; Mattijn Morren; Jozien Bensing; Mieke Rijken
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  13 in total

1.  User engagement with web-based genomics education videos and implications for designing scalable patient education materials.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Wei Wei; Xinhang Li; Yat S So; Suzanne Bakken; Chunhua Weng; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Genetic Counseling in Middle School Science Club: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Allison Hutchinson; Elizabeth McMillan; Emily Griese; Valerie Bares; Quinn Stein; Laurie Daily
Journal:  J STEM Outreach       Date:  2019-11-19

3.  Factors Affecting Family Compliance with Genetic Testing of Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Yonah Hendel; Gal Meiri; Hagit Flusser; Analya Michaelovski; Ilan Dinstein; Idan Menashe
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-04

4.  Impact of Previous Genetic Counseling and Objective Numeracy on Accurate Interpretation of a Pharmacogenetics Test Report.

Authors:  Kelly Drelles; Robert Pilarski; Kandamurugu Manickam; Abigail B Shoben; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Michelle M Langer; Myra I Roche; Noel T Brewer; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Khan; Cristina Leos; Elizabeth Moore; Michelle Brown; Christine Rini
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.

Authors:  Dana Watnick; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Katie M Gallagher; Nehama Teitelman; Katherine E Donohue; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Siobhan M Dolan; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  Implementation of personalized medicine in Central-Eastern Europe: pitfalls and potentials based on citizen's attitude.

Authors:  Peter Balicza; Andras Terebessy; Zoltan Grosz; Noemi Agnes Varga; Aniko Gal; Balint Andras Fekete; Maria Judit Molnar
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  GeneLiFT: A novel test to facilitate rapid screening of genetic literacy in a diverse population undergoing genetic testing.

Authors:  Hila Milo Rasouly; Nicole Cuneo; Maddalena Marasa; Natalia DeMaria; Debanjana Chatterjee; Jacqueline J Thompson; David A Fasel; Julia Wynn; Wendy K Chung; Paul Appelbaum; Chunhua Weng; Suzanne Bakken; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Knowledge and Attitudes About Genetic Testing Among Black and White Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maura K McCall; Sikemi Ibikunle; Yolanda Murphy; Kenneth Hunter; Margaret Q Rosenzweig
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-10-06

10.  Metastatic breast cancer patient perceptions of somatic tumor genomic testing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Adams; Sarah Asad; Raquel Reinbolt; Katharine A Collier; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Susan Gillespie; James L Chen; Mathew A Cherian; Anne M Noonan; Sagar Sardesai; Jeffrey VanDeusen; Robert Wesolowski; Nicole Williams; Charles L Shapiro; Erin R Macrae; Robert Pilarski; Amanda E Toland; Leigha Senter; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Clara N Lee; Maryam B Lustberg; Daniel G Stover
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.