Literature DB >> 24927802

Information-seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk.

Rachel Mills1, Jill Powell, William Barry, Susanne B Haga.   

Abstract

As the practice of medicine has become more patient-driven, patients are increasingly seeking health information within and outside of their doctor's office. Patients looking for information and support are often turning to the Internet as well as family and friends. As part of a study to understand the impact of delivery method of genomic testing for type 2 diabetes risk on comprehension and health-related behaviors, we assessed participants' information-seeking and sharing behaviors after receiving their results in-person with a genetic counselor or online through the testing company's website. We found that 32.6 % of participants sought information after receiving the genomic test results for T2DM; 80.8 % of those that did seek information turned to the Internet. Eighty-eight percent of participants reported that they shared their T2DM risk results, primarily with their spouse/partner (65 %) and other family members (57 %) and children (19 %); 14 % reported sharing results with their health provider. Sharing was significantly increased in those who received results in-person from the genetic counselor (p = 0.0001). Understanding patients' interests and needs for additional information after genomic testing and with whom they share details of their health is important as more information and clinical services are available and accessed outside the clinician's office. Genetic counselors' expertise and experience in creating educational materials and promoting sharing of genetic information can facilitate patient engagement and education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927802      PMCID: PMC4454388          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9736-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  45 in total

Review 1.  Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control.

Authors:  K Viswanath
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Knowledge about type 2 diabetes risk and prevention of African-American and Hispanic adults and adolescents with family history of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Karen Weber Cullen; Bonnie B Buzek
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients.

Authors:  C Tuffrey; F Finlay
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

5.  The role of disease perceptions and results sharing in psychological adaptation after genetic susceptibility testing: the REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider.

Authors:  Burcu F Darst; Lisa Madlensky; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-02-05

7.  Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale.

Authors:  Cameron D Norman; Harvey A Skinner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Jo Burke; Sonya Bacic; David J Amor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data.

Authors:  Jeana H Frost; Michael P Massagli
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  2 in total

1.  Counselees' Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Shelly Hovick; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Erynn Gordon; Barbara Bernhardt; Lisa Wawak; Karen Wernke; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Amanda E Toland; J S Roberts; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A Qualitative Study of Anticipated Decision Making around Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing: the Role of Scientifically Concordant and Discordant Expectations.

Authors:  Alicia G Carmichael; Bailey B Hulswit; Emily J Moe; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.