Literature DB >> 20203003

A commercial real-time PCR kit provides greater sensitivity than direct sequencing to detect KRAS mutations: a morphology-based approach in colorectal carcinoma.

Bárbara Angulo1, Elena García-García, Rebeca Martínez, Ana Suárez-Gauthier, Esther Conde, Manuel Hidalgo, Fernando López-Ríos.   

Abstract

KRAS mutation testing has become a standard procedure in the management of patients with carcinomas. The most frequently used method for KRAS testing is direct sequencing of PCR products. The development of commercial real-time quantitative PCR kits offers a useful alternative since they are in theory much more sensitive than direct sequencing and they avoid post- PCR handling. We present our experience as a reference center for the study of KRAS mutations, comparing direct sequencing and the use of a commercial real-time quantitative PCR kit, as well as determining the sensitivity of both procedures in clinical practice. The TheraScreen K-RAS Mutation Kit identified mutations in 75 (44%) of the 170 tumors. Three cases were tested positive using TheraScreen K-RAS Mutation Kit and negative by direct sequencing. We then compared the sensitivity of the kit and that of direct sequencing using 74 mutant tumors. The kit was able to detect the presence of a mutation in a 1% dilution of the total DNA in 13.5% of the tumors and, in 84%, KRAS mutation was identified at a dilution of 5%. Sequencing was able to detect KRAS mutations when the mutant DNA represented 10% of the total DNA in 20/74 (27%) of the tumors. When the mutant DNA represented 30% of the total DNA, sequencing could detect mutations in 56/74 (76%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203003      PMCID: PMC2860464          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  28 in total

1.  LightCycler technology in molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Elaine Lyon; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Helena Linardou; Issa J Dahabreh; Dimitra Kanaloupiti; Fotios Siannis; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Paris Kosmidis; Christos A Papadimitriou; Samuel Murray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Correlation of kinase genotype and clinical outcome in the North American Intergroup Phase III Trial of imatinib mesylate for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: CALGB 150105 Study by Cancer and Leukemia Group B and Southwest Oncology Group.

Authors:  Michael C Heinrich; Kouros Owzar; Christopher L Corless; Donna Hollis; Ernest C Borden; Christopher D M Fletcher; Christopher W Ryan; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Cathryn Rankin; Robert S Benjamin; Vivien H Bramwell; George D Demetri; Monica M Bertagnolli; Jonathan A Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Miriam Martini; Francesca Molinari; Silvio Veronese; Michele Nichelatti; Salvatore Artale; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Piercarlo Saletti; Sara De Dosso; Luca Mazzucchelli; Milo Frattini; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations.

Authors:  Guido Sauter; James Lee; John M S Bartlett; Dennis J Slamon; Michael F Press
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  KRAS mutations and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer: practical application of patient selection.

Authors:  Antonio Jimeno; Wells A Messersmith; Fred R Hirsch; Wilbur A Franklin; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; Erika Hitre; Jerzy Zaluski; Chung-Rong Chang Chien; Anatoly Makhson; Geert D'Haens; Tamás Pintér; Robert Lim; György Bodoky; Jae Kyung Roh; Gunnar Folprecht; Paul Ruff; Christopher Stroh; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Johannes Nippgen; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Miriam Martini; Francesca Molinari; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Sabrina Arena; Piercarlo Saletti; Sara De Dosso; Luca Mazzucchelli; Milo Frattini; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  46 in total

1.  The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy is associated with KRAS mutation status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaxiong Zhang; Wenfeng Fang; Yue Yan; Mengyao Wang; Shiyang Kang; Jin Sheng; Jianhua Zhan; Nan Chen; Shaodong Hong; Yunpeng Yang; Yuxiang Ma; Dacheng He; Tao Qin; Ting Zhou; Yanna Tang; Xiaobo He; Wenhua Liang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Guidelines for biomarker testing in metastatic melanoma: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  S Martín-Algarra; M T Fernández-Figueras; J A López-Martín; A Santos-Briz; A Arance; M D Lozano; A Berrocal; J J Ríos-Martín; E Espinosa; J L Rodríguez-Peralto
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Analysis of Molecular Markers by Anatomic Tumor Site in Stage III Colon Carcinomas from Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial NCCTG N0147 (Alliance).

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Michelle R Mahoney; Harry H Yoon; Thomas C Smyrk; Stephen N Thibodeau; Richard M Goldberg; Garth D Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Prognostic impact of deficient DNA mismatch repair in patients with stage III colon cancer from a randomized trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Michelle R Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Stephen N Thibodeau; Robert S Warren; Monica M Bertagnolli; Garth D Nelson; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  External quality assessment for KRAS testing is needed: setup of a European program and report of the first joined regional quality assessment rounds.

Authors:  Ellen Bellon; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Sabine Tejpar; Karen Cox; Gert de Hertogh; Karin de Stricker; Anders Edsjö; Vassilis Gorgoulis; Gerald Höfler; Andreas Jung; Athanassios Kotsinas; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Fernando López-Ríos; Tine Plato Hansen; Etienne Rouleau; Peter Vandenberghe; Johan J M van Krieken; Elisabeth Dequeker
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-03-26

Review 7.  COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications.

Authors:  Florence Mauger; Alexandre How-Kit; Jörg Tost
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  KRAS mutation analysis on low percentage of colon cancer cells: the importance of quality assurance.

Authors:  J R Dijkstra; D A M Heideman; G A Meijer; J E Boers; N A 't Hart; J Diebold; A Hirschmann; G Hoefler; G Winter; G Miltenberger-Miltenyi; S V Pereira; S D Richman; P Quirke; E L Rouleau; J M Guinebretiere; S Tejpar; B Biesmans; J H J M van Krieken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cong Tan; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A comparison of four methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed specimens from metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Mototsugu Matsunaga; Toshikado Kaneta; Keisuke Miwa; Wataru Ichikawa; Ken-Ichi Fujita; Fumio Nagashima; Junji Furuse; Masayoshi Kage; Yoshito Akagi; Yasutsuna Sasaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.