Literature DB >> 18946061

K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Christos S Karapetis1, Shirin Khambata-Ford, Derek J Jonker, Chris J O'Callaghan, Dongsheng Tu, Niall C Tebbutt, R John Simes, Haji Chalchal, Jeremy D Shapiro, Sonia Robitaille, Timothy J Price, Lois Shepherd, Heather-Jane Au, Christiane Langer, Malcolm J Moore, John R Zalcberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment with cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, improves overall and progression-free survival and preserves the quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer that has not responded to chemotherapy. The mutation status of the K-ras gene in the tumor may affect the response to cetuximab and have treatment-independent prognostic value.
METHODS: We analyzed tumor samples, obtained from 394 of 572 patients (68.9%) with colorectal cancer who were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone, to look for activating mutations in exon 2 of the K-ras gene. We assessed whether the mutation status of the K-ras gene was associated with survival in the cetuximab and supportive-care groups.
RESULTS: Of the tumors evaluated for K-ras mutations, 42.3% had at least one mutation in exon 2 of the gene. The effectiveness of cetuximab was significantly associated with K-ras mutation status (P=0.01 and P<0.001 for the interaction of K-ras mutation status with overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively). In patients with wild-type K-ras tumors, treatment with cetuximab as compared with supportive care alone significantly improved overall survival (median, 9.5 vs. 4.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001) and progression-free survival (median, 3.7 months vs. 1.9 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.54; P<0.001). Among patients with mutated K-ras tumors, there was no significant difference between those who were treated with cetuximab and those who received supportive care alone with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.98; P=0.89) or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; P=0.96). In the group of patients receiving best supportive care alone, the mutation status of the K-ras gene was not significantly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.01; P=0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a colorectal tumor bearing mutated K-ras did not benefit from cetuximab, whereas patients with a tumor bearing wild-type K-ras did benefit from cetuximab. The mutation status of the K-ras gene had no influence on survival among patients treated with best supportive care alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946061     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1314 in total

1.  Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Efsevia Vakiani; Manickam Janakiraman; Ronglai Shen; Rileen Sinha; Zhaoshi Zeng; Jinru Shia; Andrea Cercek; Nancy Kemeny; Michael D'Angelica; Agnes Viale; Adriana Heguy; Philip Paty; Timothy A Chan; Leonard B Saltz; Martin Weiser; David B Solit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Three-dimensionally specific inhibition of DNA repair-related genes by activated KRAS in colon crypt model.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tsunoda; Yasuo Takashima; Takahiro Fujimoto; Midori Koyanagi; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Keiko Doi; Yoko Tanaka; Masahide Kuroki; Takehiko Sasazuki; Senji Shirasawa
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Identification of predictive markers of response to the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in K-ras-mutated colorectal cancer.

Authors:  John J Tentler; Sujatha Nallapareddy; Aik Choon Tan; Anna Spreafico; Todd M Pitts; M Pia Morelli; Heather M Selby; Maria I Kachaeva; Sara A Flanigan; Gillian N Kulikowski; Stephen Leong; John J Arcaroli; Wells A Messersmith; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Part 1: background, methodology, and clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

6.  HGF rescues colorectal cancer cells from EGFR inhibition via MET activation.

Authors:  David Liska; Chin-Tung Chen; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; James G Christensen; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Uptake of KRAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe, Latin America and Asia.

Authors:  Fortunato Ciardiello; Sabine Tejpar; Nicola Normanno; Domenica Mercadante; Tracey Teague; Bruno Wohlschlegel; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Hypertension as a predictor of advanced colorectal cancer outcome and cetuximab treatment response.

Authors:  S Sud; C O'Callaghan; C Jonker; C Karapetis; T Price; N Tebbutt; J Shapiro; G Van Hazel; N Pavlakis; P Gibbs; M Jeffrey; L Siu; S Gill; R Wong; D Jonker; D Tu; R Goodwin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer anti-EGFR therapy.

Authors:  Cristiana Lo Nigro; Vincenzo Ricci; Daniela Vivenza; Cristina Granetto; Teresa Fabozzi; Emanuela Miraglio; Marco C Merlano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Chiara Cremolini; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Antonio Russo; Francesco Mannavola; Giuseppe Perrone; Francesco Pantano; Fotios Loupakis; Daniele Rossini; Elena Ongaro; Erica Bonazzina; Emanuela Dell'Aquila; Marco Imperatori; Alice Zoccoli; Giuseppe Bronte; Giovanna De Maglio; Gabriella Fontanini; Clara Natoli; Alfredo Falcone; Daniele Santini; Andrea Onetti-Muda; Salvatore Siena; Giuseppe Tonini; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.