Literature DB >> 19223544

PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies.

Andrea Sartore-Bianchi1, Miriam Martini, Francesca Molinari, Silvio Veronese, Michele Nichelatti, Salvatore Artale, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Piercarlo Saletti, Sara De Dosso, Luca Mazzucchelli, Milo Frattini, Salvatore Siena, Alberto Bardelli.   

Abstract

The monoclonal antibodies (moAb) panitumumab and cetuximab target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and have proven valuable for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). EGFR-mediated signaling involves two main intracellular cascades: on one side KRAS activates BRAF, which in turn triggers the mitogen-activated protein kinases. On the other, membrane localization of the lipid kinase PIK3CA counteracts PTEN and promotes AKT1 phosphorylation, thereby activating a parallel intracellular axis. Constitutive activation of KRAS bypasses the corresponding signaling cascade and, accordingly, patients with mCRC bearing KRAS mutations are clinically resistant to therapy with panitumumab or cetuximab. We hypothesized that mutations activating PIK3CA could also preclude responsiveness to EGFR-targeted moAbs through a similar mechanism. Here, we present the mutational analysis of PIK3CA and KRAS and evaluation of the PTEN protein status in a cohort of 110 patients with mCRC treated with anti-EGFR moAbs. We observed 15 (13.6%) PIK3CA and 32 (29.0%) KRAS mutations. PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with clinical resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab; none of the mutated patients achieved objective response (P = 0.038). When only KRAS wild-type tumors were analyzed, the statistical correlation was stronger (P = 0.016). Patients with PIK3CA mutations displayed a worse clinical outcome also in terms of progression-free survival (P = 0.035). Our data indicate that PIK3CA mutations can independently hamper the therapeutic response to panitumumab or cetuximab in mCRC. When the molecular status of the PIK3CA/PTEN and KRAS pathways are concomitantly ascertained, up to 70% of mCRC patients unlikely to respond to EGFR moAbs can be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19223544     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  301 in total

1.  Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Efsevia Vakiani; Manickam Janakiraman; Ronglai Shen; Rileen Sinha; Zhaoshi Zeng; Jinru Shia; Andrea Cercek; Nancy Kemeny; Michael D'Angelica; Agnes Viale; Adriana Heguy; Philip Paty; Timothy A Chan; Leonard B Saltz; Martin Weiser; David B Solit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  HGF rescues colorectal cancer cells from EGFR inhibition via MET activation.

Authors:  David Liska; Chin-Tung Chen; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; James G Christensen; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Development of an integrated genomic classifier for a novel agent in colorectal cancer: approach to individualized therapy in early development.

Authors:  Todd M Pitts; Aik Choon Tan; Gillian N Kulikowski; John J Tentler; Amy M Brown; Sara A Flanigan; Stephen Leong; Christopher D Coldren; Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Christopher Korch; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong; Nishan H Fernando; Andrew B Nixon; Stephanie Cushman; Mebea Aklilu; Johanna C Bendell; Michael A Morse; Gerard C Blobe; Jill Ashton; Herbert Pang; Herbert I Hurwitz
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  No evidence for interference of h&e staining in DNA testing: usefulness of DNA extraction from H&E-stained archival tissue sections.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Kaori Shima; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Noriko Tanaka; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Zhi Rong Qian; Mohan Brahmandam; Janina A Longtine; Neal I Lindeman; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Phosphatase and tensin homolog expression related to cetuximab effects in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Shen; Jian Yang; Zhi Xu; Dong-Ying Gu; Jin-Fei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Aspirin and colorectal cancer: back to the future.

Authors:  David Tougeron; Dan Sha; Sashidhar Manthravadi; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer anti-EGFR therapy.

Authors:  Cristiana Lo Nigro; Vincenzo Ricci; Daniela Vivenza; Cristina Granetto; Teresa Fabozzi; Emanuela Miraglio; Marco C Merlano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A novel predictive strategy by immunohistochemical analysis of four EGFR ligands in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.

Authors:  Michihiro Yoshida; Takaya Shimura; Mikinori Sato; Masahide Ebi; Takahiro Nakazawa; Hiromitsu Takeyama; Takashi Joh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.