Literature DB >> 23242173

KRAS mutation analysis on low percentage of colon cancer cells: the importance of quality assurance.

J R Dijkstra1, D A M Heideman, G A Meijer, J E Boers, N A 't Hart, J Diebold, A Hirschmann, G Hoefler, G Winter, G Miltenberger-Miltenyi, S V Pereira, S D Richman, P Quirke, E L Rouleau, J M Guinebretiere, S Tejpar, B Biesmans, J H J M van Krieken.   

Abstract

KRAS mutation testing is mandatory for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are eligible for treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor targeting agent, since tumors with a mutation are not sensitive to the drug. Several methods for mutation testing are in use and the need for external quality assurance has been demonstrated. An often little addressed but important issue in external quality assurance schemes is a low percentage of tumor cells in the test samples, where the analytical sensitivity of most tests becomes critical. Using artificial samples based on a mixture of cell lines with known mutation status of the KRAS gene, we assessed the reliability of a series of commonly used methods (Sanger sequencing, high resolution melting, pyrosequencing, and amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction) on samples with 0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 % mutated cells. Nine laboratories throughout Europe participated and submitted a total of ten data sets. The limit of detection of each method differed, ranging from >15-5 % tumor cells. All methods showed a decreasing correct mutation call rate proportionally with decreasing percentage of tumor cells. Our findings indicate that laboratories and clinicians need to be aware of the decrease in correct mutation call rate proportionally with decreasing percentage of tumor cells and that external quality assurance schemes need to address the issue of low tumor cell percentage in the test samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242173     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1356-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  21 in total

Review 1.  Unlocking the archive--gene expression in paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  F Lewis; N J Maughan; V Smith; K Hillan; P Quirke
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 2.  KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program.

Authors:  J H J M van Krieken; A Jung; T Kirchner; F Carneiro; R Seruca; F T Bosman; P Quirke; J F Fléjou; T Plato Hansen; G de Hertogh; P Jares; C Langner; G Hoefler; M Ligtenberg; D Tiniakos; S Tejpar; G Bevilacqua; A Ensari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Athanasios C Tsiatis; Alexis Norris-Kirby; Roy G Rich; Michael J Hafez; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Kathleen M Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests.

Authors:  Kelly Oliner; Todd Juan; Sid Suggs; Michael Wolf; Ildiko Sarosi; Daniel J Freeman; Tibor Gyuris; Will Baron; Andreas Bakker; Alex Parker; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  KRAS and BRAF mutations in advanced colorectal cancer are associated with poor prognosis but do not preclude benefit from oxaliplatin or irinotecan: results from the MRC FOCUS trial.

Authors:  Susan D Richman; Matthew T Seymour; Philip Chambers; Faye Elliott; Catherine L Daly; Angela M Meade; Graham Taylor; Jennifer H Barrett; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A multicenter blinded study to evaluate KRAS mutation testing methodologies in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Vicki Whitehall; Kayla Tran; Aarti Umapathy; Fabienne Grieu; Chelsee Hewitt; Tiffany-Jane Evans; Tuty Ismail; Wei Qi Li; Peter Collins; Paul Ravetto; Barbara Leggett; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Richie Soong; Stephen Fox; Rodney J Scott; Alexander Dobrovic; Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories.

Authors:  Heather Spencer Feigelson; Katrina A B Goddard; Monique A Johnson; Kellyan C Funk; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Tia L Kauffman; Dhananjay A Chitale; Loic Le Marchand; C Sue Richards
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-04-25

9.  Benchmarking of mutation diagnostics in clinical lung cancer specimens.

Authors:  Silvia Querings; Janine Altmüller; Sascha Ansén; Thomas Zander; Danila Seidel; Franziska Gabler; Martin Peifer; Eva Markert; Kathryn Stemshorn; Bernd Timmermann; Beate Saal; Stefan Klose; Karen Ernestus; Matthias Scheffler; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Elisabeth Brambilla; Jürgen Wolf; Peter Nürnberg; Roman K Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  MicroRNA expression in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue using real time quantitative PCR: the strengths and pitfalls.

Authors:  J R Dijkstra; L J M Mekenkamp; S Teerenstra; I De Krijger; I D Nagtegaal
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.310

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

2.  Adequately defining tumor cell proportion in tissue samples for molecular testing improves interobserver reproducibility of its assessment.

Authors:  Benoît Lhermitte; Caroline Egele; Noëlle Weingertner; Damien Ambrosetti; Bérengère Dadone; Valérie Kubiniek; Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; John Coyne; Jean-François Michiels; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Rouleau; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  RAS testing for colorectal cancer patients is reliable in European laboratories that pass external quality assessment.

Authors:  V Tack; M J L Ligtenberg; A G Siebers; P D M Rombout; P D Dabir; R D A Weren; J H J M van Krieken; E M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Conventional and semi-automatic histopathological analysis of tumor cell content for multigene sequencing of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Kazdal; Eugen Rempel; Cristiano Oliveira; Michael Allgäuer; Alexander Harms; Kerstin Singer; Elke Kohlwes; Steffen Ormanns; Ludger Fink; Jörg Kriegsmann; Michael Leichsenring; Katharina Kriegsmann; Fabian Stögbauer; Luca Tavernar; Jonas Leichsenring; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Rémi Longuespée; Hauke Winter; Martin Eichhorn; Claus Peter Heußel; Felix Herth; Petros Christopoulos; Martin Reck; Thomas Muley; Wilko Weichert; Jan Budczies; Michael Thomas; Solange Peters; Arne Warth; Peter Schirmacher; Albrecht Stenzinger; Mark Kriegsmann
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04

5.  RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers.

Authors:  Annemarie Boleij; Bastiaan B J Tops; Paul D M Rombout; Elizabeth M Dequeker; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; J Han van Krieken
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20

6.  Testing for NRAS Mutations in Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas.

Authors:  Pawel Sadlecki; Dariusz Grzanka; Marek Grabiec
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry - a sensitive, reliable, fast and cost-effective technique.

Authors:  Mark Kriegsmann; Norbert Arens; Volker Endris; Wilko Weichert; Jörg Kriegsmann
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 8.  Guidance for laboratories performing molecular pathology for cancer patients.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Zandra Deans; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Anders Edsjö; Etienne Rouleau; Francesc Solé; Erik Thunnissen; Wim Timens; Ed Schuuring; Elisabeth Dequeker; Samuel Murray; Manfred Dietel; Patricia Groenen; J Han Van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.