Literature DB >> 19124802

KRAS mutations and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer: practical application of patient selection.

Antonio Jimeno1, Wells A Messersmith, Fred R Hirsch, Wilbur A Franklin, S Gail Eckhardt.   

Abstract

Recent retrospective evidence from several randomized studies has established that advanced colorectal cancer patients with tumors harboring a mutation in the KRAS gene do not derive benefit from the administration of epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. This represents a paradigm-changing event and will have substantial impact on current and future anticancer drug development. These results add to the economic and ethical considerations involved in the development of novel targeted therapies and should increase our scrutiny of mechanisms of resistance and predictive biomarkers while in earlier developmental stages. In this article we will review the available clinical data, discuss the potential implications for future drug development in colorectal cancer, and provide a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects of KRAS mutation testing. In particular we aimed at enumerating the available procedures for mutation detection and their main characteristics, as well as comparing them from a clinical feasibility standpoint. While the true specificity and sensitivity of these methods have yet to be fully characterized, a better understanding of the differences between tests will be critical so that clinicians and pathologists can fully integrate this testing into the routine care of patients with colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19124802     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  78 in total

Review 1.  Personalized cancer medicine and the future of pathology.

Authors:  H Moch; P R Blank; M Dietel; G Elmberger; K M Kerr; J Palacios; F Penault-Llorca; G Rossi; T D Szucs
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Cetuximab, chemotherapy and KRAS status in mCRC.

Authors:  Sharlene Gill; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  PET imaging of HER1-expressing xenografts in mice with 86Y-CHX-A''-DTPA-cetuximab.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Karen J Wong; Diane E Milenic; Kayhan Garmestani; Kwamena E Baidoo; Lawrence P Szajek; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Constitutively active Harvey Ras confers resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy with cetuximab and gefitinib.

Authors:  Rodney B Luwor; Yang Lu; Xinqun Li; Ke Liang; Zhen Fan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cong Tan; Xiang Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Targeted KRAS mutation assessment on patient tumor histologic material in real time diagnostics.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Elpida Charalambous; Bart Biesmans; Andigoni Malousi; Eleni Vrettou; George Fountzilas; George Karkavelas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests.

Authors:  Kelly Oliner; Todd Juan; Sid Suggs; Michael Wolf; Ildiko Sarosi; Daniel J Freeman; Tibor Gyuris; Will Baron; Andreas Bakker; Alex Parker; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  KRAS status analysis and anti-EGFR therapies: is comprehensiveness a biologist's fancy or a clinical necessity?

Authors:  E Lopez-Crapez; L Mineur; H Emptas; P-J Lamy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic and predictive value of TOPK stratified by KRAS and BRAF gene alterations in sporadic, hereditary and metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  I Zlobec; F Molinari; M Kovac; M P Bihl; H J Altermatt; J Diebold; H Frick; M Germer; M Horcic; M Montani; G Singer; H Yurtsever; A Zettl; L Terracciano; L Mazzucchelli; P Saletti; M Frattini; K Heinimann; A Lugli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.