Literature DB >> 2017424

Protein quality and antinutritional factors in wild and cultivated species of Vigna spp.

E Carnovale1, E Lugaro, E Marconi.   

Abstract

The nutritional quality of wild and cultivated species of Vigna has been evaluated. Wild species showed significantly higher protein content (P less than 0.01), antitryptic activity (P less than 0.005) and tannin content (P less than 0.025) and significantly lower protein digestibility (P less than 0.005). No significant differences were found with regard to protein quality, measured as chemical score corrected by the digestibility; sulphur amino acids turned out to be limiting in both groups. In addition no correlations were found between sulphur amino acids and protein levels, or between sulphur amino acid and trypsin inhibitor levels. Selected lines showed an improvement from the nutritional point of view linked to lower antitryptic factors and tannin content, which may give rise to a decreased resistance to pests. For all the properties considered, whether physical or biochemical, wild samples presented wider variations and the types considered most primitive were those that differed most from the cultivated ones, whose properties were altogether more consistent. In vitro protein digestibility turned out to be a useful parameter in evaluating wild and improved samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017424     DOI: 10.1007/bf02196377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr        ISSN: 0921-9668            Impact factor:   3.921


  8 in total

1.  Chromatographic determination of cystine as cysteic acid.

Authors:  E SCHRAM; S MOORE; E J BIGWOOD
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Nutritive value of some improved varieties of legumes.

Authors:  M A Khan; I Jacobsen; B O Eggum
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.638

3.  Unavailability of cystine from trypsin inhibitors as a factor contributing to the poor nutritive value of navy beans.

Authors:  M L Kakade; R L Arnold; I E Liener; P E Waibel
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Measuring protein quality.

Authors:  L D Satterlee; H F Marshall; J M Tennyson
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.849

5.  Tannin content of cowpeas, chickpeas, pigeon peas, and mung beans.

Authors:  M L Price; A E Hagerman; L G Butler
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Rapid release of protease inhibitors from soybeans: immunochemical quantitation and parallels with lectins.

Authors:  D L Hwang; W K Yang; D E Foard
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Chemical methods suitable for screening for protein content and quality in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) meals.

Authors:  I M Evans; D Boulter
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Nutritional quality of some improved cultivars of cowpea.

Authors:  D P Kachare; J K Chavan; S S Kadam
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.921

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Chemical composition, digestibility and antinutritional factors content of two wild legumes: Styphonolobium burseroides and Acacia bilimekii.

Authors:  A Sotelo; P Migliaro; A Toledo; J Contreras
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Chemical composition and nutritional potential of yam bean seeds (Pachyrhizus erosus L. urban).

Authors:  A C Santos; M S Cavalcanti; L C Coelho
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Changes in nutrient and antinutrient composition of Vigna racemosa flour in open and controlled fermentation.

Authors:  V H Difo; E Onyike; D A Ameh; G C Njoku; U S Ndidi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Nutritional and antinutritional characteristics of seven South Indian wild legumes.

Authors:  V Vadivel; K Janardhanan
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Chemical analysis and nutritional assessment of the less known pulses, Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal and Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich.

Authors:  P Siddhuraju; K Vijayakumari; K Janardhanan
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Applicability of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for determination of crude protein content in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) leaves.

Authors:  Erick K Towett; Merle Alex; Keith D Shepherd; Severin Polreich; Ermias Aynekulu; Brigitte L Maass
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.863

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.