| Literature DB >> 20161779 |
Jie Wen1, Tina Rönn, Anders Olsson, Zhen Yang, Bin Lu, Yieping Du, Leif Groop, Charlotte Ling, Renming Hu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have reported several genetic variants to be reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes. Additional variants have also been detected from a metaanalysis of three GWASs, performed in populations of European ancestry. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of 17 genetic variants from 15 candidate loci, identified in type 2 diabetes GWASs and the metaanalysis, in a Han Chinese cohort. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20161779 PMCID: PMC2818850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Type 2 diabetes cases | Controls | |
|
| 1165 (455/710) | 1136 (353/783) |
| Age (years) | 60.3±10.9 | 59.1±7.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.2±3.4 | 24.1±3.0 |
| Fasting C-peptide (nmol/l) | 1.09 (0.62) | n/a |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 8.4±3.0 | 5.2±0.4 |
| 2 h postprandial plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 15.1±5.3 | 6.0±1.0 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.65 (1.15) | 1.23 (0.87) |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD for normally distributed values (age, BMI and glucose) and median (IQR) for non-normally distributed values (C-peptide and triglycerides).
Genotypic and allelic distribution of type 2 diabetes susceptibility SNPs and association with type 2 diabetes in a Han Chinese cohort.
| Nearest gene(s) | SNP | Alleles | MAF | Genotype Frequency T2D Cases Controls | ORadd (95% CI) |
| Power |
|
| rs10811661 |
| 0.475 | 0.351/0.457/0.1920.271/0.510/0.220 | 1.26 (1.12–1.43) | 1.8*10−4 | 91% |
|
| rs10946398 | A/ | 0.392 | 0.319/0.481/0.2000.369/0.478/0.153 | 1.23 (1.09–1.39) | 7.1*10−4 | 87% |
|
| rs7903146 | C/ | 0.033 | 0.897/0.103/0.0000.938/0.060/0.003 | 1.61 (1.19–2.18) | 2.3*10−3 | 59% |
|
| rs4430796 | T/ | 0.293 | 0.456/0.442/0.1020.498/0.419/0.083 | 1.16 (1.02–1.32) | 0.026 | 35% |
|
| rs17782313 | T/ | 0.191 | 0.610/0.340/0.0500.652/0.312/0.035 | 1.18 (1.01–1.37) | 0.032 | 13% |
|
| rs1801282 |
| 0.064 | 0.901/0.099/0.0000.877/0.118/0.005 | 1.30 (1.00–1.68) | 0.050 | 46% |
|
| rs864745 |
| 0.225 | 0.643/0.316/0.0410.608/0.334/0.058 | 1.16 (1.00–1.34) | 0.054 | 29% |
|
| rs1111875 | T/ | 0.279 | 0.485/0.423/0.0920.517/0.408/0.075 | 1.14 (1.00–1.30) | 0.056 | 52% |
|
| rs780094 |
| 0.481 | 0.283/0.519/0.1970.260/0.520/0.221 | 1.11 (0.98–1.26) | 0.088 | 5% |
|
| rs4402960 | C/ | 0.253 | 0.541/0.378/0.0810.565/0.364/0.071 | 1.12 (0.98–1.28) | 0.11 | 71% |
|
| rs8050136 | C/ | 0.119 | 0.748/0.236/0.0160.774/0.216/0.011 | 1.15 (0.96–1.38) | 0.14 | 47% |
|
| rs5219 | G/ | 0.398 | 0.339/0.504/0.1570.374/0.455/0.170 | 1.07 (0.95–1.21) | 0.26 | 96% |
|
| rs11196218 | G/ | 0.262 | 0.509/0.444/0.0500.549/0.378/0.073 | 1.07 (0.93–1.23) | 0.34 | 100% |
|
| rs7961581 | T/ | 0.202 | 0.636/0.311/0.0530.638/0.321/0.041 | 1.05 (0.90–1.22) | 0.55 | 24% |
|
| rs290487 | T/ | 0.362 | 0.404/0.462/0.1340.409/0.461/0.131 | 1.00 (0.88–1.13) | 0.99 | 100% |
|
| rs12779790 | A/ | 0.164 | 0.697/0.268/0.0360.699/0.276/0.026 | 1.02 (0.87–1.20) | 0.80 | 29% |
|
| rs4607103 |
| 0.369 | 0.408/0.446/0.1450.406/0.450/0.144 | 1.00 (0.89–1.13) | 0.96 | 32% |
Risk allele denoted in bold.
Calculated using logistic regression, assuming an additive model adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
P-values shown are not corrected for multiple testing.
Assuming an additive model, a T2D frequency of 6%, α = 0.05, MAF based on this study and OR as previously reported.
MAF, minor allele frequency in control samples; T2D, type 2 diabetes.