Literature DB >> 20160851

Confidence limits on one-stage model parameters in benchmark risk assessment.

Brooke E Buckley1, Walter W Piegorsch, R Webster West.   

Abstract

In modern environmental risk analysis, inferences are often desired on those low dose levels at which a fixed benchmark risk is achieved. In this paper, we study the use of confidence limits on parameters from a simple one-stage model of risk historically popular in benchmark analysis with quantal data. Based on these confidence bounds, we present methods for deriving upper confidence limits on extra risk and lower bounds on the benchmark dose. The methods are seen to extend automatically to the case where simultaneous inferences are desired at multiple doses. Monte Carlo evaluations explore characteristics of the parameter estimates and the confidence limits under this setting.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160851      PMCID: PMC2659669          DOI: 10.1007/s10651-007-0076-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat        ISSN: 1352-8505            Impact factor:   1.119


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of the benchmark dose method for dichotomous data: model dependence and model selection.

Authors:  Salomon Sand; Agneta Falk Filipsson; Katarina Victorin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Comparison of available benchmark dose softwares and models using trichloroethylene as a model substance.

Authors:  Agneta Falk Filipsson; Katarina Victorin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation with quantal response data.

Authors:  Obaid M Al-Saidy; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Daniela K Nitcheva
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess; K L Deal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

Review 7.  Quantitative risk assessment and the limitations of the linearized multistage model.

Authors:  D P Lovell; G Thomas
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.

Authors:  David W Gaylor; Ralph L Kodell
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 9.  Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments.

Authors:  C J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Model Selection and Estimation with Quantal-Response Data in Benchmark Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu; Walter Piegorsch; Ronald W West; LingLing An
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  bmd: an R package for benchmark dose estimation.

Authors:  Signe M Jensen; Felix M Kluxen; Jens C Streibig; Nina Cedergreen; Christian Ritz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.