Literature DB >> 12758215

Comparison of available benchmark dose softwares and models using trichloroethylene as a model substance.

Agneta Falk Filipsson1, Katarina Victorin.   

Abstract

By using trichloroethylene as a model substance the U.S. EPA benchmark dose software was compared to the software by Crump and the software by Kalliomaa. Dose-response and dose-effect data on the liver, kidneys, central nervous system (CNS), and tumours were selected for the evaluation. Based on the present study the U.S. EPA software is preferable to the other softwares for dichotomous data. A wider range in benchmark doses was often observed for dichotomous data when the numbers of dose levels were limited. The log-logistic model in most cases gave the best fit when ranking the dichotomous models. In addition, the log-logistic model often implied a more conservative benchmark dose. For continuous data it was more difficult to find a model describing the data. The softwares by Kalliomaa and by the U.S. EPA offered the best opportunities for benchmark dose modelling of continuous data. Flexible models, like the Hill- and the Mult model, are needed for S-shaped continuous data but these models demand more dose levels in order to describe the data. Since the number of dose levels are important for model selection study design is important and should be further evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12758215     DOI: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  Estimation of benchmark dose for micronucleus occurrence in Chinese vinyl chloride-exposed workers.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Hong-Shan Tan; Xiao-Ming Ma; Yuan Sun; Nan-Nan Feng; Li-Fang Zhou; Yun-Jie Ye; Yi-Liang Zhu; Yong-Liang Li; Paul W Brandt-Rauf; Nai-Jun Tang; Zhao-Lin Xia
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Confidence limits on one-stage model parameters in benchmark risk assessment.

Authors:  Brooke E Buckley; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.119

4.  Effects of seasons and parts on volatile N-nitrosamines and their exposure and risk assessment in raw chicken and duck meats.

Authors:  Kexin Li; Rui Wang; Xiaoxu Wang; Changxia Sun; Qiang Li
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.117

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.