Literature DB >> 20144438

Delays in minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring devices: a review of current technology.

D Barry Keenan1, John J Mastrototaro, Gayane Voskanyan, Garry M Steil.   

Abstract

Through the use of enzymatic sensors-inserted subcutaneously in the abdomen or ex vivo by means of microdialysis fluid extraction-real-time minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices estimate blood glucose by measuring a patient's interstitial fluid (ISF) glucose concentration. Signals acquired from the interstitial space are subsequently calibrated with capillary blood glucose samples, a method that has raised certain questions regarding the effects of physiological time lags and of the duration of processing delays built into these devices. The time delay between a blood glucose reading and the value displayed by a continuous glucose monitor consists of the sum of the time lag between ISF and plasma glucose, in addition to the inherent electrochemical sensor delay due to the reaction process and any front-end signal processing delays required to produce smooth traces. Presented is a review of commercially available, minimally invasive continuous glucose monitors with manufacturer reported device delays. The data acquisition process for the Medtronic MiniMed (Northridge, CA) continuous glucose monitoring system-CGMS Gold-and the Guardian RT monitor is described with associated delays incurred for each processing step. Filter responses for each algorithm are examined using in vitro hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps, as well as with an analysis of fast glucose excursions from a typical meal response. Results demonstrate that the digital filters used by each algorithm do not cause adverse effects to fast physiologic glucose excursions, although nonphysiologic signal characteristics can produce greater delays. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144438      PMCID: PMC2769894          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  26 in total

Review 1.  The MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS).

Authors:  J Mastrototaro
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.634

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study.

Authors:  B W Bode; T M Gross; K R Thornton; J J Mastrototaro
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 3.  The GlucoWatch biographer: a frequent automatic and noninvasive glucose monitor.

Authors:  M J Tierney; J A Tamada; R O Potts; R C Eastman; K Pitzer; N R Ackerman; S J Fermi
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  A microdialysis technique for continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in diabetic patients (part 2).

Authors:  M Varalli; G Marelli; A Maran; S Bistoni; M Luzzana; P Cremonesi; G Caramenti; F Valgimigli; Alessandro Poscia
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  A randomized multicenter trial comparing the GlucoWatch Biographer with standard glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  H Peter Chase; Roy Beck; William Tamborlane; Bruce Buckingham; Nelly Mauras; Eva Tsalikian; Tim Wysocki; Stuart Weinzimer; Craig Kollman; Katrina Ruedy; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Accuracy of the 5-day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements.

Authors:  Richard L Weinstein; Sherwyn L Schwartz; Ronald L Brazg; Jolyon R Bugler; Thomas A Peyser; Geoffrey V McGarraugh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Can interstitial glucose assessment replace blood glucose measurements?

Authors:  K Rebrin; G M Steil
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  The effect of preapplication of corticosteroids on skin irritation and performance of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer.

Authors:  Janet A Tamada; Tara L Davis; Amy D Leptien; Jonathan Lee; Betty Wang; Margarita Lopatin; Charles Wei; Don Wilson; Kathleen Comyns; Richard C Eastman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Clinical evaluation of a continuous minimally invasive glucose flux sensor placed over ultrasonically permeated skin.

Authors:  Han Chuang; Elizabeth Taylor; Thomas W Davison
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system for home-use conditions.

Authors:  Bruce Bode; Michael Silver; Richard Weiss; Kathryn Martin
Journal:  Manag Care       Date:  2008-08
View more
  57 in total

1.  Continuous glucose monitoring considerations for the development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas system.

Authors:  D Barry Keenan; Benyamin Grosman; Harry W Clark; Anirban Roy; Stuart A Weinzimer; Rajiv V Shah; John J Mastrototaro
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes: improvement in accuracy by correcting for background current.

Authors:  Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Julia M Engle; Ryan G Massoud; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  Toward closing the loop: an update on insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Tandy Aye; Jen Block; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Glucose Variability Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Assessment Is Associated with Postoperative Complications after Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroki Sato; Michihiro Hosojima; Tomomi Ishikawa; Kenji Aoki; Takeshi Okamoto; Akihiko Saito; Masanori Tsuchida
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.

Authors:  D Barry Keenan; Raymond Cartaya; John J Mastrototaro
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Shane W English; Hood Thabit; Karen Caldwell; Janet M Allen; Kavita Kumareswaran; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Marianna Nodale; Ahmad Haidar; Mark L Evans; Rowan Burnstein; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  Implantable nanosensors: toward continuous physiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Timothy T Ruckh; Heather A Clark
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dessi P Zaharieva; Kamuran Turksoy; Sarah M McGaugh; Rubin Pooni; Todd Vienneau; Trang Ly; Michael C Riddell
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.