Literature DB >> 6235306

Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.

D L Medin, M W Altom, T D Murphy.   

Abstract

Acquisition of category-level information can be based on experience with category members (induced) as well as on direct presentation of prototypical values (given). To investigate the effects of these two types of information, a relational coding model of categorization was developed in which classification is based on a mixture of exemplar and prototype information. In two experiments, subjects learned about two ill-defined categories. Stimuli were geometric shapes varying along four binary-valued dimensions. For three groups of subjects, training consisted of (a) experience with exemplars only, (b) learning prototype values followed by exemplar experience, or (c) learning prototype values concurrently with exemplar experience. Following training, all subjects received classification tests on prototype values as well as on old and new exemplars. By varying the relative use of prototype and exemplar information, the mixture model accurately accounted for category judgements in all three groups. For subjects directly presented with prototype values, classification was based on a mixture of similarity to prototypes and to stored exemplars. In contrast, subjects who only received experience with exemplars appeared to base their category judgements solely on similarity to stored exemplars, even though they could accurately judge the prototype values. The two components of the mixture model are related to subjects' classification strategies and the nature of abstracted, category-level information.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235306     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.3.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  19 in total

1.  Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: a case study.

Authors:  G Storms; P De Boeck; W Ruts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Comparisons between exemplar similarity and mixed prototype models using a linearly separable category structure.

Authors:  Roger D Stanton; Robert M Nosofsky; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

3.  As easy to memorize as they are to classify: the 5-4 categories and the category advantage.

Authors:  Mark Blair; Don Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

4.  Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Ezgi Mercan; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning.

Authors:  A Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

6.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

7.  In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization.

Authors:  Wolf Vanpaemel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

8.  Learning and using specific instances.

Authors:  D J Volper; S E Hampson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The relation between recognition memory and classification learning.

Authors:  J Metcalfe; R P Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

10.  Comprehending the impossible: what role do selectional restriction violations play?

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Evelyn Milburn; Nikole D Patson; Michael Walsh Dickey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.