Literature DB >> 1405551

Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences.

T S Bell1, D D Dirks, T D Trine.   

Abstract

The relative importance and absolute contributions of various spectral regions to speech intelligibility under conditions of either neutral or predictable sentential context were examined. Specifically, the frequency-importance functions for a set of monosyllabic words embedded in a highly predictive sentence context versus a sentence with little predictive information were developed using Articulation Index (AI) methods. Forty-two young normal-hearing adults heard sentences presented at signal-to-noise ratios from -8 to +14 dB in a noise shaped to conform to the peak spectrum of the speech. Results indicated only slight differences in 1/3-octave importance functions due to differences in semantic context, although the crossovers differed by a constant 180 Hz. Methodological and theoretical aspects of parameter estimation in the AI model are discussed. The results suggest that semantic context, as defined by these conditions, may alter frequency-importance relationships in addition to the dynamic range over which intelligibility rises.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1405551     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3504.950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  16 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

2.  Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

6.  The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yufan Du; Yi Shen; Xihong Wu; Jing Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition for multiple bands: Implications for the Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Band importance for sentences and words reexamined.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Children with autism spectrum disorder have reduced otoacoustic emissions at the 1 kHz mid-frequency region.

Authors:  Loisa Bennetto; Jessica M Keith; Paul D Allen; Anne E Luebke
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.