Literature DB >> 2329093

Apical hair cells and hearing.

C A Prosen1, D B Moody, W C Stebbins, D W Smith, M S Sommers, J N Brown, R A Altschuler, J E Hawkins.   

Abstract

This study assessed the contribution of the apical hair cells to hearing. Guinea pigs, chinchillas and monkeys were behaviorally trained using positive reinforcement to respond to pure-tone stimuli. When a stable audiogram had been determined, each subject received one of three experimental treatments: ototoxic drug administration, low-frequency noise exposure, or the application of a cryoprobe to the bony wall of the cochlear apex. After post-treatment audiograms stabilized, subjects were euthanized and the percentage of hair cells remaining was assessed by light microscopy. Results indicate that a redundancy of encoding mechanisms exist in the mammalian cochlea for low-frequency stimuli. They also suggest that a very small percentage of apical hair cells are sufficient for some low-frequency hearing. Finally, data from this and other studies suggest that the low-frequency threshold shift caused by the loss of a certain percentage of apical hair cells is less pronounced than the high-frequency threshold shift caused by the loss of a comparable percentage of basal hair cells. These data agree with anatomical and electrophysiological evidence that functional as well as anatomical differences may exist between the apex and base of the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2329093     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90079-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Chemical exposure and hearing loss.

Authors:  Pierre Campo; Thais C Morata; OiSaeng Hong
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.800

4.  Audio-vestibular evaluation in patients with essential tremor.

Authors:  Hatice Balaban; Emine Elif Altuntaş; Ismail Onder Uysal; Ilteriş Ahmet Sentürk; Suat Topaktaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Mutations in the Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene (WFS1) define a clinical entity of dominant low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Marci M Lesperance; James W Hall; Theresa B San Agustin; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04

6.  Structure and mechanics of supporting cells in the guinea pig organ of Corti.

Authors:  Deborah E Zetes; Jason A Tolomeo; Matthew C Holley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert; Lois J Matthews; Richard A Schmiedt; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 8.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.