Literature DB >> 15669615

Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. II. Matching under natural viewing conditions.

Peter B Delahunt1, Joseph L Hardy, Katsunori Okajima, John S Werner.   

Abstract

Age-related changes in the spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity function of detection, measured along S and L - M cone axes, were demonstrated in a companion paper [Hardy et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 49 (2005)]. Here senescent changes in chromatic contrast appearance were assessed by contrast-matching functions (CMFs). Luminance and chromatic CMFs (S and L - M axes) were compared for younger (age 18-31 yr) and older (age 65-75 yr) trichromatic subjects by using stimuli that were perceptually anchored to the same physical standard contrasts. Subjects matched the contrast of test gratings of various spatial frequencies (0.5-8 cycles per degree) to the standard stimuli under natural viewing conditions. Because of changes in the visual system with age, the standard stimuli were closer to threshold for older subjects; however, in general, the shapes of the CMFs were similar for both groups. The results suggest that the perception of relative contrasts across spatial frequencies is stable with age.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15669615      PMCID: PMC2586913          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.22.000060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  35 in total

1.  Variation of chromatic sensitivity across the life span.

Authors:  K Knoblauch; F Vital-Durand; J L Barbur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Comparison of color and luminance contrast: apples versus oranges?

Authors:  E Switkes; M A Crognale
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Aging of the human lens.

Authors:  J Pokorny; V C Smith; M Lutze
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Color naming, lens aging, and grue: what the optics of the aging eye can teach us about color language.

Authors:  Joseph L Hardy; Christina M Frederick; Paul Kay; John S Werner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Visual ageing: unspecific decline of the responses to luminance and colour.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; V Porciatti; M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Threshold and suprathreshold spatiotemporal response throughout adulthood.

Authors:  U Tulunay-Keesey; J N Ver Hoeve; C Terkla-McGrane
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Relative contributions of optical and neural limitations to human contrast sensitivity at different luminance levels.

Authors:  M A Losada; R Navarro; J Santamaría
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings.

Authors:  K T Mullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. I. Detection under conditions controlling for optical factors.

Authors:  Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Neural compensation for long-term asymmetric optical blur to improve visual performance in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Age-related changes in contrast gain related to the M and P pathways.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Individual and age-related variation in chromatic contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  The Verriest Lecture: Short-wave-sensitive cone pathways across the life span.

Authors:  John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The effect of senescence on orientation discrimination and mechanism tuning.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The Psychophysical Assessment of Hierarchical Magno-, Parvo- and Konio-Cellular Visual Stream Dysregulations in Migraineurs.

Authors:  Michael F Wesner; James Brazeau
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2019-11-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.