Literature DB >> 25238735

A novel image toggle tool for comparison of serial mammograms: automatic density normalization and alignment-development of the tool and initial experience.

Satoshi Honda1, Hiroko Tsunoda, Wataru Fukuda, Yukihisa Saida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose is to develop a new image toggle tool with automatic density normalization (ADN) and automatic alignment (AA) for comparing serial digital mammograms (DMGs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed an ADN and AA process to compare the images of serial DMGs. In image density normalization, a linear interpolation was applied by taking two points of high- and low-brightness areas. The alignment was calculated by determining the point of the greatest correlation while shifting the alignment between the current and prior images. These processes were performed on a PC with a 3.20-GHz Xeon processor and 8 GB of main memory. We selected 12 suspected breast cancer patients who had undergone screening DMGs in the past. Automatic processing was retrospectively performed on these images. Two radiologists subjectively evaluated them.
RESULTS: The process of the developed algorithm took approximately 1 s per image. In our preliminary experience, two images could not be aligned approximately. When they were aligned, image toggling allowed detection of differences between examinations easily.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new tool to facilitate comparative reading of DMGs on a mammography viewing system. Using this tool for toggling comparisons might improve the interpretation efficiency of serial DMGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238735     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-014-0362-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  8 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Eric L Rosen; Joseph Y Lo; Edgardo I Gimenez; Ruth Walsh; Mary Scott Soo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.

Authors:  P Skaane; A Skjennald; K Young; E Egge; I Jebsen; E M Sager; B Scheel; E Søvik; A K Ertzaas; S Hofvind; M Abdelnoor
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 3.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms.

Authors:  W M Morrow; R B Paranjape; R M Rangayyan; J L Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mitsutomi Ishiyama; Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu; Mari Kikuchi; Yukihisa Saida; Sonoe Hiramatsu
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.239

6.  Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Kari Young; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Solveig Hofvind; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.