Literature DB >> 20117294

A case study in proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.

Hanne M Kooy1, Benjamin M Clasie, Hsiao-Ming Lu, Thomas M Madden, Hassan Bentefour, Nicolas Depauw, Judy A Adams, Alexei V Trofimov, Denis Demaret, Thomas F Delaney, Jacob B Flanz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We completed an implementation of pencil-beam scanning (PBS), a technology whereby a focused beam of protons, of variable intensity and energy, is scanned over a plane perpendicular to the beam axis and in depth. The aim of radiotherapy is to improve the target to healthy tissue dose differential. We illustrate how PBS achieves this aim in a patient with a bulky tumor. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our first deployment of PBS uses "broad" pencil-beams ranging from 20 to 35 mm (full-width-half-maximum) over the range interval from 32 to 7 g/cm(2). Such beam-brushes offer a unique opportunity for treating bulky tumors. We present a case study of a large (4,295 cc clinical target volume) retroperitoneal sarcoma treated to 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (presurgery) using a course of photons and protons to the clinical target volume and a course of protons to the gross target volume.
RESULTS: We describe our system and present the dosimetry for all courses and provide an interdosimetric comparison. DISCUSSION: The use of PBS for bulky targets reduces the complexity of treatment planning and delivery compared with collimated proton fields. In addition, PBS obviates, especially for cases as presented here, the significant cost incurred in the construction of field-specific hardware. PBS offers improved dose distributions, reduced treatment time, and reduced cost of treatment. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117294     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Visualization of a variety of possible dosimetric outcomes in radiation therapy using dose-volume histogram bands.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Jan Unkelbach; Thomas F DeLaney; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-09

2.  Tracker Readout ASIC for Proton Computed Tomography Data Acquisition.

Authors:  Robert P Johnson; Joel Dewitt; Cole Holcomb; Scott Macafee; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; David Steinberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

3.  Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Stephen Dowdell; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  H M Kooy; C Grassberger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of energy deposition and secondary particle production in proton therapy of brain using a slab head phantom.

Authors:  Sayyed Bijan Jia; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh; Ali Asghar Mowlavi; Mahdy Ebrahimi Loushab
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-05-01

6.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments.

Authors:  Weixing Cai; Hakan Oesten; Benjamin Clasie; Brian Winey; Kyung-Wook Jee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A full-scale clinical prototype for proton range verification using prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy.

Authors:  Fernando Hueso-González; Moritz Rabe; Thomas A Ruggieri; Thomas Bortfeld; Joost M Verburg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Four-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating how the extent of intensity-modulation impacts motion effects in proton therapy lung treatments.

Authors:  Stephen Dowdell; Clemens Grassberger; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Numerical solutions of the γ-index in two and three dimensions.

Authors:  Benjamin M Clasie; Gregory C Sharp; Joao Seco; Jacob B Flanz; Hanne M Kooy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.