Literature DB >> 23044713

Numerical solutions of the γ-index in two and three dimensions.

Benjamin M Clasie1, Gregory C Sharp, Joao Seco, Jacob B Flanz, Hanne M Kooy.   

Abstract

The γ-index is used routinely to establish correspondence between two dose distributions. The definition of the γ-index can be written with a single equation but solving this equation at millions of points is computationally expensive, especially in three dimensions. Our goal is to extend the vector-equation method in Bakai et al (2003 Phys. Med. Biol.48 3543-53) to higher order for better accuracy and, as important, to determine the magnitude of accuracy in a higher order solution. We construct a numerical framework for calculating the γ-index in two and three dimensions and present an efficient method for calculating the γ-index with zeroth-, first- and second-order methods using tricubic spline interpolation. For an intensity-modulated radiation therapy example with 1.78 × 10⁶ voxels, the zeroth-order, first-order, first-order iterations and semi-second-order methods calculate the three-dimensional γ-index in 1.5, 4.7, 34.7 and 35.6 s with 36.7%, 1.1%, 0.2% and 0.8% accuracy, respectively. The accuracy of linear interpolation with this example is 1.0%. We present efficient numerical methods for calculating the three-dimensional γ-index with tricubic spline interpolation. The first-order method with iterations is the most accurate and fastest choice of the numerical methods if the dose distributions may have large second-order gradients. Furthermore, the difference between iterations can be used to determine the accuracy of the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044713      PMCID: PMC3522748          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/6981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  A revision of the gamma-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions.

Authors:  Annemarie Bakai; Markus Alber; Fridtjof Nüsslin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation.

Authors:  Tom Depuydt; Ann Van Esch; Dominique Pierre Huyskens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  A fast algorithm for gamma evaluation in 3D.

Authors:  Markus Wendling; Lambert J Zijp; Leah N McDermott; Ewoud J Smit; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Ben J Mijnheer; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dosimetric impact of motion in free-breathing and gated lung radiotherapy: a 4D Monte Carlo study of intrafraction and interfraction effects.

Authors:  Joao Seco; Greg C Sharp; Ziji Wu; David Gierga; Florian Buettner; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Geometric interpretation of the gamma dose distribution comparison technique: interpolation-free calculation.

Authors:  Tao Ju; Tim Simpson; Joseph O Deasy; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; Jay W Burmeister; Nesrin Dogan; Thomas J LoSasso; James G Mechalakos; Dimitris Mihailidis; Andrea Molineu; Jatinder R Palta; Chester R Ramsey; Bill J Salter; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Ning J Yue; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A case study in proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Benjamin M Clasie; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Thomas M Madden; Hassan Bentefour; Nicolas Depauw; Judy A Adams; Alexei V Trofimov; Denis Demaret; Thomas F Delaney; Jacob B Flanz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Efficient gamma index calculation using fast Euclidean distance transform.

Authors:  Mingli Chen; Weiguo Lu; Quan Chen; Kenneth Ruchala; Gustavo Olivera
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of Interfractional Variations on Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Maryam Moteabbed; Alexei Trofimov; Gregory C Sharp; Yi Wang; Anthony L Zietman; Jason A Efstathiou; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.

Authors:  M Moteabbed; G C Sharp; Y Wang; A Trofimov; J A Efstathiou; H-M Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Stephen Dowdell; Steve Jiang; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dosimetric Impact of the Positional Imaging Frequency for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy - A Voxel-by-Voxel Analysis.

Authors:  Mona Splinter; Ilias Sachpazidis; Tilman Bostel; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Christian Thieke; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Dimos Baltas; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Derivative based sensitivity analysis of gamma index.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar; Anirudh Pradhan; T Ganesh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  A comparison of anatomical and dosimetric variations in the first 15 fractions, and between fractions 16 and 25, of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Haihua Yang; Yu Tu; Wei Wang; Wei Hu; Weijun Ding; Changhui Yu; Chao Zhou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Three-dimensional gamma criterion for patient-specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams.

Authors:  Chang Chang; Kendra L Poole; Anthony V Teran; Scott Luckman; Dennis Mah
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation.

Authors:  Tilman Bostel; Ilias Sachpazidis; Mona Splinter; Nina Bougatf; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Dimos Baltas; Jürgen Debus; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations for Post-prostatectomy Radiotherapy to the Prostatic Fossa-Relevance for the Frequency of Position Verification Imaging and Treatment Adaptation.

Authors:  Mona Splinter; Tilman Bostel; Ilias Sachpazidis; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Dimos Baltas; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.