Literature DB >> 30736026

Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments.

Weixing Cai1, Hakan Oesten, Benjamin Clasie, Brian Winey, Kyung-Wook Jee.   

Abstract

To promote accurate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system, a new quality assurance (QA) procedure employing a cone-shaped scintillator detector has been developed for multiple QA tasks in a semi-automatic manner. The cone-shaped scintillator detector (XRV-124, Logos Systems, CA) is sensitive to both x-ray and proton beams. It records scintillation on the cone surface as a 2D image, from which the geometry of the radiation field that enters and exits the cone can be extracted. Utilizing this feature, QA parameters that are essential to PBS IGRT treatment were measured and analyzed. The first applications provided coincidence checks of laser, imaging and radiation isocenters, and dependencies on gantry angle and beam energies. The analysis of the Winston-Lutz test was made available by combining the centricity measurements of the x-ray beam and the pencil beam. The accuracy of the gantry angle was validated against console readings provided by the digital encoder and an agreement of less than 0.2° was found. The accuracy of the position measurement was assessed with a robotic patient positioning system (PPS) and an agreement of less than 0.5 mm was obtained. The centricity of the two onboard x-ray imaging systems agreed well with that from the routinely used Digital Imaging Positioning System (DIPS), up to a consistent small shift of (-0.5 mm, 0.0 mm, -0.3 mm). The pencil beam spot size, in terms of σ of Gaussian fitting, agreed within 0.2 mm for most energies when compared to the conventional measurements by a 2D ion-chamber array (MatriXX-PT, IBA Dosimetry, Belgium). The cone-shaped scintillator system showed advantages in making multi-purpose measurements with a single setup. The in-house algorithms were successfully implemented to measure and analyze key QA parameters in a semi-automatic manner. This study presents an alternative and more efficient approach for IGRT QA for PBS and potentially for linear accelerators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30736026      PMCID: PMC7448303          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab056d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Peter A Balter; Lei Dong; Katja M Langen; D Michael Lovelock; Moyed Miften; Douglas J Moseley; Jean Pouliot; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Sua Yoo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Treatment planning and verification of proton therapy using spot scanning: initial experiences.

Authors:  Antony J Lomax; Terence Böhringer; Alessandra Bolsi; Doelf Coray; Frank Emert; Gudrun Goitein; Martin Jermann; Shixiong Lin; Eros Pedroni; Hanspeter Rutz; Otto Stadelmann; Beate Timmermann; Jorn Verwey; Damien C Weber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system.

Authors:  Sandeep Dhanesar; Narayan Sahoo; Matthew Kerr; M Brad Taylor; Paige Summers; X Ronald Zhu; Falk Poenisch; Michael Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Long-term stability and mechanical characteristics of kV digital imaging system for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mingyao Zhu; Thomas Botticello; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Brian Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  First Clinical Investigation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Deformable Registration for Adaptive Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Catarina Veiga; Guillaume Janssens; Ching-Ling Teng; Thomas Baudier; Lucian Hotoiu; Jamie R McClelland; Gary Royle; Liyong Lin; Lingshu Yin; James Metz; Timothy D Solberg; Zelig Tochner; Charles B Simone; James McDonough; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A case study in proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Benjamin M Clasie; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Thomas M Madden; Hassan Bentefour; Nicolas Depauw; Judy A Adams; Alexei V Trofimov; Denis Demaret; Thomas F Delaney; Jacob B Flanz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  An end-to-end examination of geometric accuracy of IGRT using a new digital accelerator equipped with onboard imaging system.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Kayla N Kielar; Ed Mok; Annie Hsu; Sonja Dieterich; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Image-guided radiotherapy: has it influenced patient outcomes?

Authors:  Alexis Bujold; Tim Craig; David Jaffray; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study.

Authors:  Markus Stock; Marlies Pasler; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Peter Homolka; Richard Poetter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Automated quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Eric Elder; Tim Fox
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility Study of Using XRV-124 Scintillation Detector for Collinearity Measurement in Uniform Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Biniam Tesfamicael; Colton Eckert; Suresh Rana
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Investigating the potential of conical scintillation detectors for patient-specific verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Levi S Johnson; Michael Price
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11

3.  Impact of magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and beam range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Jaafar Bennouna; Alonso N Gutierrez; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.