Literature DB >> 20091032

Activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Is a 32-mm femoral head superior to a 26-mm head for improving daily activities?

Isao Matsushita1, Yuji Morita, Yoshiaki Ito, Ryuichi Gejo, Tomoatsu Kimura.   

Abstract

Range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint after total hip arthroplasty (THA) could be increased by using a larger prosthetic femoral head, but it is not known whether the activities of daily living (ADL) are influenced by THA with different head sizes. Our objective was to compare postoperative ADL in patients who underwent THA using a head diameter of 26 mm or 32 mm. We assessed the range of motion and the mode of ADL after cementless primary THA. Comparison was performed between 25 joints of 24 patients who underwent THA with a 26-mm femoral head (26-mm group) and 24 joints of 20 patients with a 32-mm head (32-mm group). The postoperative range of flexion and abduction was significantly larger in the 32-mm group than in the 26-mm group. With respect to the mode of performing selected ADL such as putting on and removing pants, socks, and cutting toenails, many patients adopted the compensatory position of lumbar flexion with hip flexion plus knee extension in the 26-mm group, while a majority of the patients from the 32-mm group employed the mode of hip flexion with knee flexion. Patients with the 32-mm head showed better postoperative ADL of the ipsilateral side compared with the 26-mm head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20091032      PMCID: PMC3014487          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0909-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Intracapsular components do not change hip proprioception.

Authors:  Y Ishii; T Tojo; K Terajima; S Terashima; J E Bechtold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

2.  Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a new concept.

Authors:  O K Muratoglu; C R Bragdon; D O'Connor; R S Perinchief; D M Estok; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison of polyethylene wear with femoral heads of 22 mm and 32 mm. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  S Eggli; S z'Brun; C Gerber; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

4.  A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement.

Authors:  Fumihiro Yoshimine; Ko Ginbayashi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  J Livermore; D Ilstrup; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living.

Authors:  R C Johnston; G L Smidt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Polyethylene wear in Scanhip arthroplasty with a 22 or 32 mm head: 62 matched patients followed for 7-9 years.

Authors:  U Kesteris; T Ilchmann; H Wingstrand; R Onnerfalt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-04

8.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; A G Urquhart; K O Buehler; R H Walker; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  The problem is osteolysis.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

Authors:  Gianluca Cinotti; Niccolò Lucioli; Andrea Malagoli; Carlo Calderoli; Ferdinando Cassese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Malek; Munawar Hashmi; James P Holland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.